Ferri v. Bell, 79-2414

Decision Date24 February 1982
Docket NumberNo. 79-2414,79-2414
Citation671 F.2d 769
PartiesFrancis Rick FERRI, Appellant, v. BELL, The Honorable Griffin, United States Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, Griffith, Blair, U. S. Atty Western District of Pa., Thornburg, Richard, Former U. S. Atty Western District of Pa., Special Agent in Charge of FBI Operations in the Western Dist. of Pa., Former Special Agent in Charge FBI Operations in the Western Dist. of Pa. . Re
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit

Francis Rick Ferri, pro se.

Richard C. Turkington, Villanova, Pa., amicus curiae.

Stuart E. Schiffer, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D. C., Carlon M. O'Malley, Jr., U. S. Atty., Scranton, Pa., Leonard Schaitman, Marleigh D. Dover, Attys., Appellate Staff, Civ. Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for appellees.

Before ADAMS, GIBBONS, and VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judges.

OPINION SUR REHEARING

PER CURIAM:

Following the entry of judgment after this case was first considered on appeal, a petition for rehearing was submitted by the Government raising several objections to the Court's interpretation of the exemptions contained in the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552(b) (1976). Because of the importance of the questions raised by the Government, and because this appeal was submitted by Ferri pro se, we appointed an amicus curiae to brief the issues in dispute, granted the petition for rehearing, and vacated the original judgment. After considering the briefs of the amicus curiae 1 and the parties to this dispute, we now reinstate the original opinion but, because of new information that the Government has brought to our attention, modify and clarify the earlier judgment.

With its petition for rehearing the Government submitted for the first time various affidavits which bear significantly on the access Ferri should have to the arrest record of one Lynn Dunn, the principal witness against him at the trial in which he was convicted. Ferri indicated in his pro se brief that such information was necessary for purposes of inquiring whether the Government made an undisclosed deal with Dunn in exchange for his testimony against the defendant, in which event Ferri would have grounds to attack his conviction collaterally as a denial of due process under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), and its progeny. Appellant's Brief at 5 n.3. However, the new affidavits now supplied by the Government contain assurances by an Assistant United States Attorney and by Dunn's attorney that no such...

To continue reading

Request your trial
28 cases
  • McDonnell v. U.S.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • September 21, 1993
    ...of Justice, 654 F.2d 917, 923 (3d Cir.1981) ("Lame I ") (quoting Ferri v. Bell, 645 F.2d 1213, 1217 (3d Cir.1981), modified, 671 F.2d 769 (3d Cir.1982)) (citations omitted); seeCuccaro v. Secretary of Labor, 770 F.2d 355, 359 (3d Cir.1985) (Exemption 7(C) protects identity of individuals wh......
  • Manna v. US Dept. of Justice
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Jersey
    • March 4, 1993
    ...that a statutory exemption is applicable. See Ferri v. Bell, 645 F.2d 1213, 1221 (3d Cir.1981), modified on other grounds 671 F.2d 769 (3d Cir.1982); Committee on Masonic Homes of the R.W. Grand Lodge v. NLRB, 556 F.2d 214, 218 (3d The documents withheld from plaintiff fall into the followi......
  • Wolk Law Firm v. U.S. Nat'l Transp. Safety Bd.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • June 18, 2019
    ...materials for in camera review. 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(B) ; see also Ferri v. Bell, 645 F.2d 1213, 1225–26 (3d Cir. 1981), modified, 671 F.2d 769 (3d Cir. 1982). The agency is entitled to summary judgment in a FOIA case if the agency "describe[s] the withheld information and the justification......
  • Wiener v. F.B.I.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • September 26, 1991
    ...Donovan v. FBI, 806 F.2d 55, 58 (2d Cir.1986); Ferri v. Bell, 645 F.2d 1213, 1222 (3d Cir.1981) modified on other grounds 671 F.2d 769 (3d Cir.1982); Ingle v. Dep't of Justice, 698 F.2d 259, 263 (6th Cir.1983); Stein v. Dep't of Justice, 662 F.2d 1245, 1253 (7th Cir.1981); Davis v. CIA, 711......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT