State ex rel. McGowan v. Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority, 96-1941
Citation | 78 Ohio St.3d 518,678 N.E.2d 1388 |
Decision Date | 04 June 1997 |
Docket Number | No. 96-1941,96-1941 |
Parties | The STATE ex rel. McGOWAN v. CUYAHOGA METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY. |
Court | United States State Supreme Court of Ohio |
Harvey J. McGowan, pro se.
Stephanie R. Reed, Cleveland, for respondent.
In his propositions of law, McGowan asserts that he is entitled to a writ of mandamus to compel CMHA to provide him with access to the requested records pursuant to R.C. 149.43. Exceptions to disclosure must be strictly construed against the public records custodian, and the burden to establish an exception is on the custodian. State ex rel. James v. Ohio State Univ. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 168, 169, 637 N.E.2d 911, 912.
CMHA does not claim that any of the requested records are exempt from disclosure. In fact, most of the requested records appear to be personnel records of police officers employed by CMHA. See, e.g., State ex rel. Multimedia, Inc. v. Snowden (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 141, 142, 647 N.E.2d 1374, 1377 ().
Instead, CMHA contends that McGowan is not entitled to mandamus relief because he has or had an adequate remedy at law to obtain the requested records through either the discovery process in the injunction case or in the now-dismissed mandamus action in the court of appeals. CMHA relies on State ex rel. Shane v. New Philadelphia Police Dept. (1990), 56 Ohio St.3d 36, 37, 564 N.E.2d 89, 90 (), and State ex rel. Hastings Mut. Ins. Co. v. Merillat (1990), 50 Ohio St.3d 152, 553 N.E.2d 646, paragraph two of the syllabus.
CMHA's contention lacks merit. We expressly overruled Shane and Hastings in State ex rel. Steckman v. Jackson (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 420, 426-427, 639 N.E.2d 83, 88-89, holding that "mandamus is the appropriate remedy to force compliance with the open-records statute." See, also, State ex rel. Findlay Publishing Co. v. Schroeder (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 580, 582, 669 N.E.2d 835, 838 (); State ex rel. Scripps Howard Broadcasting Co. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 19, 23, 652 N.E.2d 179, 183. Second, CMHA has failed to establish that any of the requested records are relevant to McGowan's common pleas court case or that these records are privileged. Cf. State ex rel. WHIO-TV-7 v. Lowe (1997), 77 Ohio St.3d 350, 673 N.E.2d 1360, syllabus. Finally, CMHA has not established that McGowan's mandamus action in the court of appeals involved the same records as this case.
Based on the foregoing, McGowan is entitled to the requested writ of mandamus.
McGowan requests costs, attorney fees, and damages in connection with this case....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. Morgan v. City of New Lexington
...action. Mandamus remains the appropriate remedy to compel compliance with R.C. 149.43. State ex rel. McGowan v. Cuyahoga Metro. Hous. Auth. (1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 518, 520, 678 N.E.2d 1388. Exceptions to Disclosure: Confidential Law-Enforcement Investigatory Records {¶ 47} New Lexington cont......
-
Relator v. Metroparks
...course of the law, because mandamus is the specific remedy as provided within R.C. 149.43. State ex rel. McGowan v. Cuyahoga Metro. Hous. Auth., 78 Ohio St.3d 518, 678 N.E.2d 1388 (1997); State ex rel. Simonsen v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 10th Dist. Franklin No. 08AP-21, 2008-Ohio-6826......
-
State ex rel. Hogan Lovells U.S., L.L.P. v. Ohio Dep't of Rehab. & Corr.
...to Ohio's Public Records Act must be construed strictly against a public office. See State ex rel. McGowan v. Cuyahoga Metro. Hous. Auth. , 78 Ohio St.3d 518, 519, 678 N.E.2d 1388 (1997). But here, because there is no ambiguity as to the term "records of inmates," there is no need to resort......
-
State ex rel. Hogan Lovells U.S. v. Ohio Dep't of Rehab. & Corr.
...Ohio's Public Records Act must be construed strictly against a public office. See State ex rel. McGowan v. Cuyahoga Metro. Hous. Auth., 78 Ohio St.3d 518, 519, 678 N.E.2d 1388 (1997). But here, because there is no ambiguity as to the term "records of inmates," there is no need to resort to ......