683 Fed.Appx. 584 (9th Cir. 2017), 14-16349, Martinez v. Usaa Federal Savings Bank
|Citation:||683 Fed.Appx. 584|
|Party Name:||CHRISTOPHER S. MARTINEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. USAA FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK; et al., Defendants-Appellees|
|Attorney:||CHRISTOPHER S. MARTINEZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, Pro se, Las Vegas, NV. For USAA FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, Defendant - Appellee: Natalie M. Cox, Esquire, Attorney, Kolesar & Leatham, Las Vegas, NV; Thomas Chris Stewart, Anastiasi Jellum, P.A., Stillwater, MN. For GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATI...|
|Judge Panel:||Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.|
|Case Date:||March 20, 2017|
|Court:||United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit|
Submitted March 8, 2017.[**]
NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 32.1)
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. D.C. No. 2:14-cv-00567-RCJ-PAL. Robert Clive Jones, District Judge, Presiding.
Martinez v. USAA Fed. Sav. Bank, (D. Nev., June 16, 2014)
CHRISTOPHER S. MARTINEZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, Pro se, Las Vegas, NV.
For USAA FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, Defendant - Appellee: Natalie M. Cox, Esquire, Attorney, Kolesar & Leatham, Las Vegas, NV; Thomas Chris Stewart, Anastiasi Jellum, P.A., Stillwater, MN.
For GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for the scrutinized Trust Ginnie Mae Remic Trust 2009-70, OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC, Defendants - Appellees: Richard Samuel Ehlers, Attorney, Wright Finlay & Zak, LLP, Las Vegas, NV.
Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
Christopher S. Martinez appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing his action alleging federal and state law claims arising from foreclosure proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court's dismissal for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), and may affirm on any ground supported by the record. Thompson v. Paul, 547 F.3d 1055, 1058-59 (9th Cir. 2008). We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Martinez's state law and declaratory judgment causes of action because Martinez failed to allege facts sufficient to state any plausible claim for relief. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009); see also Stock W., Inc. v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation, 873 F.2d 1221, 1225 (9th Cir. 1989) (holding that the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201, " only creates...
To continue readingFREE SIGN UP