Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Com'n
Decision Date | 29 November 1982 |
Docket Number | Nos. 74-1586,77-1448,79-2110 and 79-2131,s. 74-1586 |
Citation | 685 F.2d 459 |
Parties | , 18 ERC 1519, 222 U.S.App.D.C. 9, 12 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,465 NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC. and Consolidated National Intervenors, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION and United States of America, Respondents, Baltimore Gas and Electric Co., et al., Intervenors. NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION and United States of America, Respondents, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, et al., Commonwealth Edison Company, Pacific Legal Foundation, Intervenors. The STATE OF NEW YORK, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION and the United States of America, Respondents, Commonwealth Edison Company, et al., Tennessee Valley Authority, Baltimore Gas and Electric Co., et al., State of Wisconsin, Intervenors. NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION and United States of America, Respondents, Commonwealth Edison Company, et al., Tennessee Valley Authority, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, et al., Intervenors. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit |
Ronald J. Wilson, Washington, D. C., for Natural Resources Defense Council, petitioner in Nos. 74-1586, 77-1448 and 79-2131. Roger Beers, San Francisco, Cal., also entered an appearance for petitioner, Natural Resources Defense Council.
E. Leo Slaggie, Atty., Nuclear Regulatory Commission, with whom Sanford Sagalkin, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., David Shilton, Atty. Dept. of Justice, and Stephen F. Eilperin, Sol., Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for respondents. George R. Hyde, Edward J. Shawaker and John J. Zimmerman, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., also entered appearances for respondents.
Ezra I. Bialik, Asst. Atty. Gen., State of New York, New York City, with whom Robert Abrams, Atty. Gen., State of New York, Albany, N. Y., and Bronson C. LaFollette, Atty. Gen. and Patrick Walsh, Asst. Atty. Gen., State of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis., were on the joint brief, for petitioner, State of New York, and intervenor, State of Wisconsin, in No. 79-2110.
Donald P. Irwin and K. Dennis Sisk, Richmond, Va., were on the brief for intervenors Baltimore Gas and Electric Co. et al., in Nos. 74-1586, 77-1448, 79-2110 and 79-2131. George C. Freeman, Jr., Richmond, Va., also entered an appearance for intervenors, Baltimore Gas and Electric Co. et al.
Herbert S. Sanger, Jr., Gen.Counsel, Lewis E, Wallace, Dep.Gen.Counsel, Charles W. Van Beke and M. Elizabeth Culbreth, Knoxville, Tenn., for intervenor Tennessee Valley Authority in Nos. 79-2110 and 79-2131.
James P. McGranery, Jr. and Margaret R. A. Paradis, Washington, D. C., were on the brief for intervenors and amici curiae, Commonwealth Edison Co., in Nos. 74-1586, 77-1448, 79-2110 and 79-2131. Richard D. Cudahy, Washington, D. C., entered an appearance for intervenor, Commonwealth Edison Co.
Ronald A. Zumbrun, Sacramento, Cal., Raymond M. Momboisse, Albert Ferri, Jr., and Lawrence P. Jones, Washington, D. C., entered appearances for intervenor, Pac. Legal Foundation.
Before BAZELON, Senior Circuit Judge, GEORGE CLIFTON EDWARDS, Jr., * Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit, and WILKEY, Circuit Judge.
Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge BAZELON.
Judge Bazelon's opinion constitutes the opinion of the court. Judge George Clifton Edwards, Jr., concurs in all but Part IV-D of the opinion, and Judge Wilkey concurs in only Part IV-D.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Deukmejian v. Nuclear Regulatory Com'n
... ... Preservation Conference, Inc.; Ecology Action ... Club; Sandra Silver; ... As the Supreme Court has recently reminded us, "the Commission is making predictions, within ... v. Natural Resources Defense Council 7 a unanimous Supreme ... ...
-
Pacific Gas and Electric Company v. State Energy Resources Conservation Development Commission
...Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 435 U.S. 519, 98 S.Ct. 1197, 55 L.Ed.2d 460 (1978), on remand, 685 F.2d 459 (CADC 1982), cert. granted, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 443, 74 L.Ed.2d 599 30 The Act itself, § 111(b), enumerates the following purposes: "(1) to establ......
-
City of New York v. U.S. Dept. of Transp.
...an agency must be given some latitude to decide what sorts of risks it will assess. See Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. NRC, 685 F.2d 459, 516, 540-45 (D.C.Cir.1982) (Wilkey, J., dissenting), rev'd, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 2246, 76 L.Ed.2d 437 (1983). Here DOT simply concluded t......
-
Oregon Environmental Council v. Kunzman
...to its "intended readership," including "interested members of the public," National Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n, 685 F.2d 459, 487 n. 149 (D.C.Cir.1982), rev'd on other grounds sub nom. Baltimore Gas & Elec. Co. v. NRDC, 462 U.S. 87, 103 S.Ct.......
-
Arbitrary and Capricious: the Dark Canon of the United States Supreme Court in Environmental Law
...would be the same bench. 452. Baltimore Gas and Elec. Co. v. NRDC, 462 U.S. 87 (1983). 453. Nat. Res. Def. Council v. Nuclear Reg. Comm’n, 685 F.2d 459, 467 (D.C. Cir. 1983). 454. Id. at 481 (The Interagency Review Group on Nuclear Waste Management noted that the “institutional issues” may ......
-
Administering the National Environmental Policy Act
...Carolina Envtl. Study Grp. v. United States , 510 F.2d 796, 5 ELR 20181 (D.C. Cir. 1975); and Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc. v. NRC , 685 F.2d 459, 12 ELR 20465 (D.C. Cir. 1982), rev’d sub nom. Baltimore Gas & Elec. Co. v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 462 U.S. 87, 13 ELR 20544 (1983). ......