685 Fed.Appx. 173 (4th Cir. 2017), 15-1254, U.S. Home Corp. v. Settlers Crossing, L.L.C.
|Citation:||685 Fed.Appx. 173|
|Opinion Judge:||PER CURIAM:|
|Party Name:||U. S. HOME CORPORATION; LENNAR CORPORATION, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. SETTLERS CROSSING, L.L.C.; WASHINGTON PARK ESTATES, LLC; BEVARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY; STEVEN B. SANDLER; ISTAR FINANCIAL, INCORPORATED; DANIEL I. COLTON, Defendants -- Appellees|
|Attorney:||Jonathan D. Hacker, O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellants. Peter D. Keisler, SIDLEY AUSTIN, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Daniel M. Petrocelli, David Marroso, James M. Pearl, Los Angeles, California, David K. Roberts, O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellan...|
|Judge Panel:||Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.|
|Case Date:||April 12, 2017|
|Court:||United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit|
Argued March 23, 2017.
Petition for certiorari filed at, 08/07/2017
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 32.1)
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. (8:08-cv-01863-DKC). Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge.
U.S. Home Corp. v. Settlers Crossing, LLC, (D. Md., Jan. 22, 2015)
Jonathan D. Hacker, O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellants.
Peter D. Keisler, SIDLEY AUSTIN, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Daniel M. Petrocelli, David Marroso, James M. Pearl, Los Angeles, California, David K. Roberts, O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellants.
Eric Kuwana, John Rosans, William McGonigle, KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP, Washington, D.C.; Quin M. Sorenson, Erika L. Maley, SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee istar Financial Incorporated.
Thomas R. Folk, REED SMITH, LLP, Falls Church, Virginia, for Appellees Settlers Crossing, L.L.C., Washington Park Estates, L.L.C., Bevard Development Company, Steven B. Sandler, and Daniel I. Colton.
Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
The Plaintiffs-Appellants in this case, Lennar Corporation and its subsidiary U.S. Home Corporation (collectively, " Lennar" ), appeal the district court's holding that Defendant-Appellee istar Financial, Inc. (" istar" ) is entitled to specific performance under a land sales contract. For the reasons ably stated by the district court, we affirm.
This diversity appeal involves a long-running contract dispute over the sale of 1,250 acres of land in Prince George's County, Maryland (" the Property" ). Because the district court recounted the facts comprehensively, we incorporate its opinions by reference and recite only those facts necessary to our analysis.
In 2005, Lennar--a homebuilder--began negotiating with Settlers Crossing, L.L.C. (" Seller" )1--a land developer--to purchase the Property in order to develop it for residential use. That November, Lennar and Seller entered into a sales agreement under which Lennar would purchase the Property for $200 million, to be paid in full on September 30, 2006, with a $20 million deposit paid immediately. Seller turned over the environmental studies that had been conducted on the Property, and Lennar had access to the Property to inspect it from September 2005 to December 2007. Lennar learned through the studies that portions of the Property had been used as the site of a wastewater treatment plant, as well as for sand and gravel mining, and therefore some of the land could " contain heavy metals, sludge, and varying debris." J.A. 2454. Lennar in fact commissioned a number of additional studies and engaged in...
To continue readingFREE SIGN UP