Donovan v. American Airlines, Inc.

Decision Date20 September 1982
Docket NumberNo. 81-1392,81-1392
Citation686 F.2d 267
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
Parties25 Wage & Hour Cas. (BN 901, 95 Lab.Cas. P 34,258 Raymond J. DONOVAN, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., a corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

T. Timothy Ryan, Jr., Sol. of Labor, Mary-Helen Mautner, Atty., U. S. Dept. of Labor, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff-appellant.

Glen Walker, American Airlines, Inc., Legal Dept., Bickel & Case, Thomas L. Case, Louis P. Bickel, Dallas, Tex., for defendant-appellee.

Before BROWN, RUBIN and REAVLEY, Circuit Judges.

ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge:

The Secretary of Labor contends that individuals selected by American Airlines for training as flight attendants and reservation sales agents were employees of the airline, entitled to the benefit of the minimum wage and other provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act while attending American's training center at the commencement of their relationship. The district court held that these trainees were not American's employees within the meaning of the statute. Finding its interpretation correct, we affirm.

I.

American, whose headquarters are in Dallas, Texas, is a commercial air carrier engaged in interstate and overseas air transportation. To carry on its business, it employs, among others, flight attendants, who serve as crew members on American's flights, and reservation sales agents, who provide information, sell tickets, and make reservations over the telephone.

American employs about 650 new flight attendants and 800 new reservation sales agents each year. To fill these positions, it selects for training about 800 flight attendants, chosen from 70,000 applicants, and about 1,000 reservation sales agents, chosen from 30,000 applicants. American carefully screens applicants in order to evaluate their suitability for employment, reviewing their qualifications by means of a series of successive applications and group and individual interviews in order to select only the number needed to fill anticipated vacancies. In determining this number, American makes an allowance for those who will be found unsatisfactory, those who will drop out of the course voluntarily, and those who will, after completing the course, refuse employment.

Persons accepted for training are required to attend American's Learning Center in Dallas, Texas. American writes the persons selected, notifying them of their acceptance and advising them of the training class they are to attend. American also tells them that they will be required to report to their assigned base (probably New York or Chicago) immediately upon completing training and that, therefore, they should resign from other employment and leave automobiles behind. Trainees are notified about six weeks in advance of the scheduled session to allow them ample time to give notice to their employers and to complete their personal plans.

Trainees completing the course are not guaranteed a job, but, because they must give up other jobs, must receive training in Dallas, and are not paid during that time, both flight attendant and sales agent trainees generally seek to finish the course, thereby becoming eligible for jobs with American. Most assume correctly that American would not offer to spend significant amounts training them if it did not hope to make them part of the airline's work force.

During training, trainees are offered meals and housing in dormitories provided by American, although some elect not to take advantage of these facilities. They are fitted for their appropriate wardrobe (for which those who become employees pay through payroll deductions) and are assigned their base city. American reserves the right not to hire any person who does not meet its standards.

American staggers the training sessions so that it is assured a supply of trained flight attendants and sales agents as needed. Its objective is to match the date the students will complete their training with the precise date the airline will require their services so that there will be neither shortage nor excess of trained flight attendants or of reservation sales agents. The procedures generally achieve American's goal. 1 Thus, during the period covered by this lawsuit, with few exceptions, successful completion of the training resulted in employment with American. American, however, is sometimes unable to offer immediate employment to graduates. 2 Thus, on one occasion an entire class was not hired because of an unexpected slump in the airline industry.

Each trainee acknowledges, in writing, that he or she is not an employee during training, and acceptance for training is not an offer of employment by American. 3 We turn now to the different courses required of the two groups of trainees.

A. Flight Attendant Training

Flight attendant trainees receive training forty hours a week for four to five weeks. The training is conducted in classrooms and aircraft mock-up facilities. The instruction is designed to teach trainees to work for American, not for other airlines. The major part of the training is devoted to meeting the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements applicable to all flight attendants on the approximately 50 passenger airlines subject to FAA regulation. See 14 C.F.R. Part 121. Trainees must learn the emergency, safety, and convenience features of each aircraft American flies, as the FAA requires, but receive no information on other aircraft. They are taught American's emergency procedures and equipment, not those used by other airlines.

Similarly, the airline teaches them all of American's, and only American's, internal procedures, such as how to fill out cabin logs, American's policy regarding issuance of passes, and its procedures for handling pets. They are also taught American's practices in preparing and serving food and liquor, American's customer service practices, American's grooming requirements and, in general, American's "style."

During training, no trainee supplements the work of, or replaces, any American employee. Each trainee makes one observation flight as a passenger and the one orientation flight (without contact with passengers) required by the FAA, but does not assist on any commercial flight.

About twenty percent of those who start flight attendant training do not complete it, but the record does not show what part of this group American rejects, formally or informally, and what part drops out. The record is also silent on the number who complete training but decline employment.

Over fifty other institutions, including preparatory schools and junior colleges, offer training similar to American's. At least one junior college offering flight attendant training periodically reviews American's program in determining its own curriculum. If American were to hire graduates of any of these programs, however, it would treat them like untrained persons and give them the entire American training program. There is no evidence that any individual who has completed American's training as a flight attendant has been immediately hired by any other airline.

B. Reservation Sales Agent Training

Reservation agents are trained at the same Learning Center under similar conditions. Each trainee receives two or three 40-hour weeks of training conducted in special classrooms equipped with computer terminals and taught by a staff of professional instructors. The training is conducted in an academic environment and is virtually identical to the curriculum offered at vocational schools. Approximately 75 percent of the course covers operation of computer console equipment identical or similar to the consoles operated by most major airlines, travel agencies, and corporate travel departments. The balance of the training covers sales techniques, airport designations, computation of airline fares, and other subjects common to the travel industry. But trainees are taught only American's sales techniques and methods of computing fares, the features of American's air fleet, and operation of American's computer console equipment and software. American gives no instruction on the aircraft, sales techniques or procedures used by other airlines. Eighty-five to ninety percent of the reservation agents successfully complete training.

All employees, regardless of aptitude, previous education, or experience, must attend American's own training courses. Even those with experience working with computers and those with experience working in travel agencies must complete American's training course. Trainees have no contact with customers and, other than to receive training, they perform no duties that in any way serve American. They displace no American employees. American gives similar training of a more advanced nature to approximately 8,000 travel agency employees each year on a contract basis.

Almost all reservation agent trainees are offered employment by American; if they accept it, they are placed on American's payroll and receive additional on-the-job training, for which they are paid. Trainees are not obligated to accept employment with American at the conclusion of their training, and some drop out or seek other employment.

C. The District Court's Decision 4

The district court found that, unlike the education in a school or college, flight attendant training is "tailored to the needs of American." Donovan v. American Airlines, Inc., 514 F.Supp. 526, 529 (N.D.Tex.1981). But it also found that a "substantial percentage of (the) skills acquired through the (training) school ... is fully fungible," id., in that those skills can be utilized by other airlines with minimal additional training. Nevertheless, owing to the "unwillingness of the airlines to offer training tailored to transferees," these skills cannot in fact be transferred. Id. "(I)ndustry practice," the court stated, "is to require all applicants to be trained in each...

To continue reading

Request your trial
48 cases
  • McKay v. Miami-Dade Cnty.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • June 9, 2022
    ... ... Ruiz Harvesting, Inc. , 843 F.3d 1276, 1287 (11th Cir. 2016) (citing United States v ... of employment under the Act is one of economic reality[.] "); Donovan v. New Floridian Hotel, Inc. , 676 F.2d 468, 470 (11th Cir. 1982) ("It is ... American Airlines, Inc. , 686 F.2d 267, 26873 (5th Cir. 1982) (flight ... ...
  • Air Line Pilots Ass'n, Intern. v. United Air Lines, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit
    • September 30, 1986
    ... ... will constitute a pool of trained candidates for Flight Officer employment, which United Airlines may employ, if needed, within twelve months of graduation. I understand that in order to be ...         Ruby v. American Airlines, Inc., 323 F.2d 248, 256 (2d Cir.1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 913, 84 S.Ct. 658, 11 ... III 1985), that an employee is "any individual employed by an employer"); Donovan v. American Airlines, Inc., 686 F.2d 267, 272 (5th Cir.1982) (trainees for certain positions were ... ...
  • Montoya v. CRST Expedited, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts
    • September 6, 2019
    ... ... I. CRST's Business Model CRST Expedited, Inc., CRST International, Inc., and the North American Driver Training Academy ("NADTA") are part of a family of companies that provide trucking services ... 2014) ; Reich , 992 F.2d at 1028 ; Donovan v. Am. Airlines, Inc. , 686 F.2d 267, 271-72 (5th Cir. 1982) ; Otico v. Haw. Airlines, Inc. , 229 ... ...
  • Robbins v. Maggio
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • January 14, 1985
    ... ... C. Itoh & Co. (America), Inc., 725 F.2d 970, 975 (5th Cir.1984) (quoting Arango v. Guzman Travel ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 books & journal articles
  • Wages, hours, and overtime
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Texas Employment Law. Volume 1 Part III. Employee compensation, safety and benefits
    • May 5, 2018
    ...and uses this approach. Atkins v. General Motors Corp. , 701 F.2d 1124, 1127 (5th Cir. 1983); Donovan v. American Airlines, Inc. , 686 F.2d 267, 273 (5th Cir. 1982). h. Prisoners Most prisoners are not covered by the FLSA. For example, prisoners who work inside prison and for the prison are......
  • Wages, Hours, and Overtime
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Texas Employment Law. Volume 1 - 2017 Part III. Employee compensation, safety and benefits
    • August 9, 2017
    ...and uses this approach. Atkins v. General Motors Corp. , 701 F.2d 1124, 1127 (5th Cir. 1983); Donovan v. American Airlines, Inc. , 686 F.2d 267, 273 (5th Cir. 1982). h. Prisoners Most prisoners are not covered by the FLSA. For example, prisoners who work inside prison and for the prison are......
  • Wages, Hours, and Overtime
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Texas Employment Law. Volume 1 - 2016 Part III. Employee Compensation, Safety and Benefits
    • July 27, 2016
    ...of and uses this approach. Atkins v. General Motors Corp., 701 F.2d 1124, 1127 (5th Cir. 1983); Donovan v. American Airlines, Inc., 686 F.2d 267, 273 (5th Cir. h. Prisoners Most prisoners are not covered by the FLSA. For example, prisoners who work inside prison for the prison are not the p......
  • Table of cases
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Texas Employment Law. Volume 2 - 2014 Part VIII. Selected litigation issues
    • August 16, 2014
    ...Transit Authority , 1999 WL 527901, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11103 (S.D.N.Y. July 22, 1999), §25:6.B.2 Donovan v. American Airlines, Inc. , 686 F.2d 267 (5th Cir. 1982), §§9:1.B.1.b, 9:1.B.1.g Donovan v. Brown Equip. & Serv. Tools, Inc. , 666 F.2d 148 (5th Cir. 1982), §9:3.H.1 Donovan v. Grim ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT