Dennis v. Kellogg Co., s. 11–55674
Decision Date | 13 July 2012 |
Docket Number | 11–55706.,Nos. 11–55674,s. 11–55674 |
Citation | 12 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7911,687 F.3d 1149,2012 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9632 |
Parties | Harry DENNIS; Jon Koz, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs–Appellees, Stephanie Berg, Objector–Appellant, v. KELLOGG COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Defendant–Appellee. Harry Dennis; Jon Koz, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs–Appellees, Omar Rivero, Objector–Appellant, v. Kellogg Company, a Delaware corporation, Defendant–Appellee. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Editor's Note: The opinion of the United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, in Dennis v. Kellogg Co., published in the advance sheet at this citation, 687 F.3d 1149, was withdrawn from the bound volume because a superseding opinion was filed. For superseding opinion, see 2012 WL 3800230.
To continue reading
Request your trial5 cases
-
Ira Holtzman, C.P.A. v. Turza
...to the extent that is feasible. See Six Mexican Workers v. Arizona Citrus Growers, 904 F.2d 1301 (9th Cir. 1990); Dennis v. Kellogg Co., 687 F.3d 1149 (9th Cir. 2012). See also, e.g., ALI, Principles of the Law of Aggregate LitigationPage 14§3.07 (2010); Martin H. Redish, Peter Julian & Sam......
-
Dennis v. Kellogg Co.
...Circuit Judges, and Kevin Thomas Duffy, District Judge.*ORDER The Opinion filed July 13, 2012, slip op. 8109, and appearing at 687 F.3d 1149 (9th Cir.2012), is withdrawn. It may not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit. With the Opinion withdr......
-
In re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litig.
...and incentive awards are discussed below, in Section II. 6. Many of the objectors incorrectly rely on Dennis v. Kellogg Company, 687 F.3d 1149 (9th Cir. 2012) ("Kellogg I"), which was withdrawn and superseded by Kellogg II, discussed above. 7. The Court observed that Rule 23(b)(2) classes a......
-
In re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litig.
...and incentive awards are discussed below, in Section II. 6. Many of the objectors incorrectly rely on Dennis v. Kellogg Company, 687 F.3d 1149 (9th Cir. 2012) ("Kellogg I"), which was withdrawn and superseded by Kellogg II, discussed above. 7. The Court observed that Rule 23(b)(2) classes a......
Request a trial to view additional results