Armijo v. Perales

• Decision Date: 01 August 2012
• Docket Number: No. 11–2098.,11–2098.
• Citation: 34 IER Cases 101,688 F.3d 685
• Parties: Paul ARMIJO, Plaintiff–Counter–Defendant–Appellee, v. Armando PERALES; Mirabel Jimenez; Arnold Chavez; Adrian Flores, in their individual capacities, Defendants–Appellants, D & M Sporting Goods, Defendant–Counter–Claimant, and Village of Columbus, New Mexico; Eddie Espinoza, Tracy Bolduc, Blas Gutierrez, Roberto Gutierrez, Brian Houltin, Allen Rosenberg, in their individual capacities; Sixth Judicial District Attorney's Office; Ernie Sera; Border Operations Task Force, Defendants.
• Court: U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit

688 F.3d 685

34 IER Cases 101

Paul ARMIJO, Plaintiff–Counter–Defendant–Appellee,

v. Armando PERALES; Mirabel Jimenez; Arnold Chavez; Adrian Flores, in their individual capacities, Defendants–Appellants,D & M Sporting Goods, Defendant–Counter–Claimant,andVillage of Columbus, New Mexico; Eddie Espinoza, Tracy Bolduc, Blas Gutierrez, Roberto Gutierrez, Brian Houltin, Allen Rosenberg, in their individual capacities; Sixth Judicial District Attorney's Office; Ernie Sera; Border Operations Task Force, Defendants.

No. 11–2098.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Aug. 1, 2012.

Editor's Note: The opinion of the United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit, in Armijo v. Perales, published in the advance sheet at this citation, 688 F.3d 685, was withdrawn from the bound volume per order of the court dated September 6, 2012.