Laessig v. Travellers' Protective Ass'n.
Decision Date | 18 June 1902 |
Parties | LAESSIG v. TRAVELLERS' PROTECTIVE ASS'N OF AMERICA. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from St. Louis circuit court; Wm. Zachritz, Judge.
Action by Rhoda J. Laessig against the Travellers' Protective Association of America. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Reversed.
Henry T. Kent and Seddon & Blair, for appellant. Sim T. Price and F. H. Bacon, for respondent.
This is a suit to recover $5,000 upon an accident benefit certificate issued by the defendant, a fraternal beneficial association organized under the laws of this state. The answer admits the character of its organization, then denies all the allegations of the petition, then admits issuing the benefit certificate, then pleads that by the terms of the certificate the defendant was exempted from liability if the member committed suicide while sane or insane, and then alleges that the member committed suicide, and therefore the defendant is not liable. The plaintiff is the widow of G. H. Clement Laessig, the deceased member, and is the beneficiary named in the certificate. There was a verdict for the plaintiff for $5,137.50, and defendant appealed.
Upon the trial the plaintiff proved the character of the defendant association, the membership of the deceased, the issuance of a certificate to the deceased on June 19, 1894, which entitled him "to all the benefits accruing from such membership under the provisions of the certificate and by-laws of this association, subject to the conditions printed on the back hereof and the application for membership," the provisions of the constitution and by-laws of the defendant, which provided a graduated compensation to be paid for external and accidental injuries, varying according to the character and seriousness of the injury, and providing for the payment of $5,000 in case of accidental death. Appellant's counsel have fairly stated the facts developed at the trial that are necessary to be considered in the determination of this appeal. That statement of facts is as follows:
On behalf of the plaintiff, the court gave the following instructions to the jury: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Edwards v. Business Men's Assurance Co., 38104.
...542, 267 S.W. 370; Brunswick v. Standard Accident Ins. Co., 278 Mo. 165, 213 S.W. 45; Laessig v. Travelers Protective Assn., 169 Mo. 280, 69 S.W. 469; Lamport v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 199 S.W. 1020; New York Life Ins. Co. v. Gamer, 303 U.S. 161, 82 L. Ed. 480. (2) A presumption that insured'......
-
Brunswick v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co.
...30 C. C. A. 48; Tuttle v. Iowa, etc., Ass'n, 132 Iowa, loc. cit. 654, 104 N. W. 1131, 7 L. R. A. (N. S.) 223; Laessig v. Insurance Co., 169 Mo. loc. cit. 280, 69 S. W. 469; Lamport v. Ins. Co., 199 S. W. For in such case neither sound sense nor logic will permit us to hold that an act inten......
-
McDowell v. Fid. Nat. Ins. Co., 20902.
...Co. v. Laird, 182 Ala. 121, 62 So. 182. (4) There was insufficient evidence as to accident for submission to the jury. Laessig v. T.P.A., 169 Mo. 272, 69 S.W. 469, 471; Warner v. St. L., etc., R. Co., 178 Mo. 125, 134, 77 S.W. 67; Lamport v. Aetna L. Ins. Co. (Mo.), 199 S.W. 1020, 1024; Cal......
-
Aufrichtig v. Columbia National Life Ins. Company
...... within the meaning of the policy. Lovelace v. Travelers' Protective Assn., 126 Mo. 104; Young. v. Ry. Mail Assn., 126 Mo.App. 325; Gates ...52; Lamport v. Ins. Co., 199 S.W. 1024; Laessig v. Travelers'. Assn., 169 Mo. 280; Williams v. Accident Assn., . 133 ......