692 Fed.Appx. 402 (9th Cir. 2017), 16-10277, United States v. Soto

Docket Nº:16-10277
Citation:692 Fed.Appx. 402
Party Name:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RODOLFO LOPEZ SOTO, a.k.a. Francisco Carmelo Adames-Cruz, a.k.a. Rodolfo Lopez-Soto, Defendant-Appellant
Attorney:For UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee: Krissa Marie Lanham, USPX - Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ. For RODOLFO LOPEZ SOTO, AKA Francisco Carmelo Adames-Cruz, AKA Rodolfo Lopez-Soto, Defendant - Appellant: David Eisenberg, I, Esquire, Attorney, David Eisenberg, PLC, Phoenix,...
Judge Panel:Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
Case Date:June 02, 2017
Court:United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
 
FREE EXCERPT

Page 402

692 Fed.Appx. 402 (9th Cir. 2017)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

RODOLFO LOPEZ SOTO, a.k.a. Francisco Carmelo Adames-Cruz, a.k.a. Rodolfo Lopez-Soto, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-10277

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

June 2, 2017

Submitted May 31, 2017. [**]

Editorial Note:

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 32.1)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. D.C. No. 2:16-cr-00315-DLR-1. Douglas L. Rayes, District Judge, Presiding.

For UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee: Krissa Marie Lanham, USPX - Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ.

For RODOLFO LOPEZ SOTO, AKA Francisco Carmelo Adames-Cruz, AKA Rodolfo Lopez-Soto, Defendant - Appellant: David Eisenberg, I, Esquire, Attorney, David Eisenberg, PLC, Phoenix, AZ.

RODOLFO LOPEZ SOTO, AKA Francisco Carmelo Adames-Cruz, AKA Rodolfo Lopez-Soto, Defendant - Appellant, Pro se, Adelanto, CA.

Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM[*]

Rodolfo Lopez Soto appeals from the district court's judgment and challenges his 37-month sentence for re-entry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Soto's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Soto has waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Because the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP