Mueller v. Auker

• Decision Date: 10 September 2012
• Docket Number: No. 11–35351.,11–35351.
• Citation: 694 F.3d 989
• Parties: Eric MUELLER; Corissa D. Mueller, husband and wife, individually and on behalf of Taige L. Mueller, a minor, and on behalf of themselves and those similarly situated, Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. April K. AUKER; Barbara Harmon; Janet A. Fletcher; Kimberly A. Osadchuk; Linda Rodenbaugh; Karl B. Kurtz; Ken Diebert, Defendants, and City of Boise; Dale Rogers; Ted Snyder; Tim Green; Richard K. MacDonald; Saint Luke's Regional Medical Center, Ltd., Defendants–Appellees.
• Court: U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

694 F.3d 989

12 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10,465

2012 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,715

Eric MUELLER; Corissa D. Mueller, husband and wife, individually and on behalf of Taige L. Mueller, a minor, and on behalf of themselves and those similarly situated, Plaintiffs–Appellants,

v. April K. AUKER; Barbara Harmon; Janet A. Fletcher; Kimberly A. Osadchuk; Linda Rodenbaugh; Karl B. Kurtz; Ken Diebert, Defendants,andCity of Boise; Dale Rogers; Ted Snyder; Tim Green; Richard K. MacDonald; Saint Luke's Regional Medical Center, Ltd., Defendants–Appellees.

No. 11–35351.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted July 24, 2012.

Filed Sept. 10, 2012.

Editor's Note: The opinion of the United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, in Mueller v. Auker, published in the advance sheet at this citation, 694 F.3d 989, was withdrawn from the bound volume because it was amended and superseded on denial of rehearing en banc October 25, 2012. For superseding opinion, see 2012 WL 5328669.