Ind. Office of Util. Consumer Counselor v. Ind. Mich. Power Co., 93A02–1303–EX–233.
| Citation | 7 N.E.3d 1025 |
| Decision Date | 11 March 2014 |
| Docket Number | No. 93A02–1303–EX–233.,93A02–1303–EX–233. |
| Parties | INDIANA OFFICE OF UTILITY CONSUMER COUNSELOR, Appellant/Cross–Appellee/ Statutory Party, v. INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY, Appellee/Petitioner, and Steel Dynamics, Inc., Cross–Appellant/Intervenor. |
| Court | Court of Appeals of Indiana |
The judgment of the Commission is affirmed. MATHIAS, J., and PYLE, J., concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
- N.M. Attorney Gen. v. N.M. Pub. Regulation Comm'n
-
New Mexico Attorney Gen. v. New Mexico Pub. Regulation Comm'n
...the amount of revenuePage 8it must collect from its customers. See Ind. Office of Util. Consumer Counselor v. Ind. Mich. Power Co., 7 N.E.3d 1025, 2014 WL 934350, at *12 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014) (memorandum decision) (non-precedential). The following hypothetical offered by SPS's testifying exp......
-
New Mexico Attorney Gen. v. New Mexico Pub. Regulation Comm'n
...reduces the amount of revenue it must collect from its customers. See Ind. Office of Util. Consumer Counselor v. Ind. Mich. Power Co., 7 N.E.3d 1025, 2014 WL 934350, at *12 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014) (memorandum decision) (non-precedential). The following hypothetical offered by SPS's testifying ......