Fales v. Fales
Decision Date | 28 October 1908 |
Citation | 29 R.I. 303,70 A. 965 |
Parties | FALES v. FALES. |
Court | Rhode Island Supreme Court |
Exceptions from Superior Court, Providence and Bristol Counties.
Petition for divorce by Warren R. Fales against Catherine Fales. There was a decision granting the petition, and respondent brings exceptions. Cause remitted for further proceedings.
Argued before DUBOIS, BLODGETT, JOHNSON, and PARKIIURST, JJ.
Charles A. Wilson and Ralph M. Greenlaw, for petitioner.
Thomas F. Farrell and Charles R. Easton, for respondent.
This petition for divorce comes before us upon the petitioner's motion to dismiss the respondent's bill of exceptions, which reads as follows:
The bill of exceptions was allowed by the presiding justice in the following terms:
The exception allowed, viz.: "And now comes the respondent in the above-entitled cause, and excepts to the decision of said court in giving decision in favor of the petitioner and against said respondent, and granting the prayer of said petition," must be dismissed, because it is too general. It is no more definite than the one criticised in Moore v. Stillman, 28 R. I. 483, 68 Atl. 417. The question whether bills of exceptions are applicable to divorce proceedings under our statutes is not properly before us, and...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kane v. Missouri Pacific Railway Company
...v. Ensworth, 65 Mo. 628; Railroad v. Cauley, 148 Ill. 490; Mfg. Co. v. Lambertson, 74 Kan. 304; Walter v. Walter, 117 Ind. 247; Fales v. Fales, 29 R. I. 303. (2) Defendant negligent in failing to equip the tender with splashers. Jones v. Railroad, 178 Mo. 528; Smith v. Fordyce, 190 Mo. 1; C......
-
McKee v. Jones Dry Goods Co.
...Walter v. Walter, 117 Ind. 247, 20 N. E. 148; Johnson v. McCulloch, 89 Ind. 270; Elton v. Markham, 20 Barb. (N. Y.) 343; Fales v. Fales, 29 R. I. 303, 70 Atl. 965. We are thus left without authority to examine any matter of alleged error at the trial, and, finding nothing otherwise to justi......
-
Blake v. Atl. Nat. Bank
...in support of its motion largely upon the opinions of this court in Moore v. Stillman, 28 R. I. 483, 68 Atl. 417, and Pales v. Pales, 29 R. I. 303, 70 Atl. 965. Moore v. Stillman, followed In Pales v. Fales, proceeded upon the assumption that the practice in bills of exceptions should confo......
-
McKee v. Jones Dry Goods Co.
... ... are Walter v. Walter, 117 Ind. 247, 20 N.E. 148; ... Johnson v. McCulloch, 89 Ind. 270; Elton v ... Markham, 20 Barb. 343; Fales v. Fales, 70 A ... We are ... thus left without authority to examine any matter ... ...