Biest v. Versteeg Shoe Company

Decision Date25 November 1902
Citation70 S.W. 1081,97 Mo.App. 137
PartiesCHRISTIAN W. BIEST, Respondent, v. VERSTEEG SHOE COMPANY, Appellant
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court.--Hon. William Zachritz Judge.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Reversed and remanded.

Carr & Carr for appellant.

(1) The so-called contract of February 5, 1900, remained indefinite and incomplete by reason of the failure of the parties to subsequently agree on plaintiff's territory. (2) The contract being denied in the pleadings, the statute of frauds is available at the trial without special pleading. Royal Remedy Co. v. Grocer Co., 90 App. 53; Hillman v Allen, 145 Mo. 643; Boyd v. Paul, 125 Mo. 9; Devore v. Devore, 138 Mo. 181; Hackett v Watts, 138 Mo. 502. (3) A contract for one year, to commence at a future date, is within the statute of frauds. Sharp v. Rhiel, 55 Mo. 97; Briar v. Robertson, 19 Mo.App. 66; Cook v. Redman, 45 Mo.App. 397.

J. Hugo Grimm for respondent.

(1) The contract sued upon in the first count does not come within the statute of frauds at all, since it may be performed within one year, and, moreover, expressly provides that plaintiff should have the right to terminate it within the year. Boggs v. Laundry Co., 86 Mo.App. 622; Harrington v. Kansas City Cable Ry. Co., 60 Mo.App. 228; 1 Reed Statute of Frauds, secs. 192, 201. (2) Since the contract does not come within the statute, it is competent by parol evidence to show any provision or stipulation that was omitted from it, especially where it appears from the writing that something is omitted. Ringer v. Holtzclaw, 112 Mo. 522; Williams v. Railroad, 153 Mo. 534; Carney v. Light Co., 10 Mo.App. 536; Ellis v. Harrison, 104 Mo. 278; Scott v. Scott, 95 Mo. 318.

GOODE, J. Bland, P. J, and Barclay, J., concur.

OPINION

GOODE, J.

--Biest, the plaintiff, was in the service of the VerSteeg Shoe Company and its predecessors, the VerSteeg-Grant Shoe Company and the TriState Shoe Company as a traveling salesman from the year 1892 to April, 1900, the territory he canvassed lying in the southeast and southwest portions of Missouri, the southern part of Illinois and certain towns in the States of Indiana and Kentucky.

A written contract was signed by Biest and the VerSteeg-Grant Shoe Company on the first day of October, 1897, by which Biest was employed as salesman "in the territory agreed upon" for the term of two years from said date, to be binding for two more years unless he gave written notice to the contrary sixty days before the expiration of each year. Said contract was mutatis mutandis, like the one to be quoted below with the exception that the latter stipulated a list of towns to be visited by Biest should be attached to it.

Plaintiff continued to work under the first contract until the second day of October, 1899, when it was extended for the further period of six months, or until the first day of April, 1900. In view of the approaching expiration of that extension, Biest and the VerSteeg-Grant Shoe Company made another contract on the fifth day of February, 1900, which is as follows:

"This agreement is made for a term of one year commencing April 1, 1900, between the VerSteeg-Grant Shoe Company and C. W. Biest, and is to be binding for two more years unless written notice be given to the contrary by C. W. Biest sixty days before the expiration of each year. It is also agreed that if the said C. W. Biest wishes to discontinue this contract on October 1, 1900, he can do so by giving said VerSteeg-Grant Shoe Company notice of same on August 1, 1900.

"The VerSteeg-Grant Shoe Company agrees to employ C. W. Biest as traveling salesman in the territory agreed upon (a list of these towns is hereto attached) and further agrees to pay the said C. W. Biest the sum of four thousand dollars per year and necessary traveling expenses, not to exceed twenty-two hundred dollars per year, provided his sales exceed one hundred thousand dollars in the territory agreed upon. The said C. W. Biest agrees to faithfully devote his full time and energy to the sale of goods in the territory agreed upon.

"It is further agreed that the said C. W. Biest will keep Frank Hahn, or some one acceptable to the VerSteeg-Grant Shoe Company actively engaged as helper in said work, and if the party selected by said C. W. Biest should not be acceptable to the said VerSteeg-Grant Shoe Company, the guarantee clause of this contract relating to traveling expenses shall be at the rate of fourteen hundred dollars instead of twenty-two hundred dollars per annum for such portion of the year or years still covered by this contract.

"It is further agreed that should the sales in said territory not reach the aggregate of one hundred thousand dollars the guarantee shall be three thousand dollars instead of four thousand dollars.

"The VerSteeg-Grant Shoe Company further agrees to allow the said C. W. Biest, when absolutely necessary, to cut the regular catalogue selling prices (not including jobs or rubber goods) to the extent of one-half per cent without deducting same from his compensation, any amount in excess of one-half per cent, or any shoes given away to customers or allowances made or extra discounts allowed to be deducted by customer, are to be charged to the said C. W. Biest or can be offset by the sale of certain goods bearing an additional profit and so designated in our catalogue. The one-half per cent to be allowed only in case the sales exceed one hundred and twelve thousand dollars against the highest amount of salary and expense guaranteed.

"Should the said C. W. Biest's sales fall below one hundred thousand dollars then this one-half per cent allowance is to be allowed him only if the amount of commissions that would be due him on a five per cent basis exceeds the compensation heretofore guaranteed to the said C. W. Biest; otherwise all cuts in prices, allowances, etc., to be charged to the said C. W. Biest.

"It is further agreed that the said VerSteeg-Grant Shoe Company, give said C. W. Biest credit for all duplicate orders filled by us from his customers during each season ending April 1, and October 1. Said VerSteeg-Grant Shoe Company, however, agrees to give the said C. W. Biest credit for such mail orders as may come from his customers for the two seasons following the season in which he actually sold such customer on the road and while in the employ of the VerSteeg-Grant Shoe Company, on condition that proper efforts shall have been made by said C. W. Biest, or his helper, in soliciting orders from said customer. This also applies to all customers sold by him two seasons ago. New accounts brought into the store by street men or our neighbors not to be included (only after having been sold by him first or next trip) only on such accounts (in the territory agreed upon) as are sold by said C. W. Biest on the road can credit be claimed.

"It is further agreed that no credit can be claimed by said C. W. Biest for orders not accepted, not shipped or not paid for, or where costs of collection be five per cent or over.

"If the said C. W. Biest's compensation, figured upon a five per cent basis, as per above contract, exceed the salary and expenses as guaranteed, the said VerSteeg-Grant Shoe Company agrees to pay him such excess.

"It is further agreed that the VerSteeg-Grant Shoe Company allow the said C. W. Biest one per cent additional commission on all goods sold to the Famous Shoe Company, being located in East St. Louis, Illinois, and that this one per cent additional commission will also apply to any store the said C. W. Biest may become financially interested in and which we may jointly agree to.

"It is further agreed that said VerSteeg-Grant Shoe Company pay the said C. W. Biest commission only on actual sales of rubber goods, and the said VerSteeg-Grant Shoe Company reserve the privilege of sending a special rubber salesman to said towns and on which sales said C. W. Biest can claim no commission.

"It is further agreed that the said VerSteeg-Grant Shoe Company will allow C. W. Biest access to the ledger twice a year in checking up his list of sales.

"Signed in duplicate this 5th day of February, 1900.

"VERSTEEG-GRANT SHOE COMPANY,

"per W. B. VERSTEEG, Secy."

A dispute having arisen between the parties in regard to the retention by the plaintiff of Frank Hahn, the helper provided in the foregoing contract, plaintiff sent in the checks for his sample trunks on the second day of April, 1900, accompanied by the following letter:

"Saint Louis, April 2, 1900.

"VerSteeg Shoe Co., City:

"Gentlemen: As my contract with your company has been broken by the action of your president, Mr. VerSteeg, in discharging me and refusing to recognize said contract, I herewith hand you my checks for said sample trunks, which you, no doubt, will want.

"Yours truly,

"C. W. BIEST."

In answer to that letter the defendant wrote plaintiff the next day as follows:

"April 3, 1900.

"C. W. Biest,

"Botanical Ave., City.

"Dear Sir: Your note of April 2 duly received. You are mistaken in saying that you are discharged by our president, Mr. VerSteeg. On the contrary he insisted that you should carry out all the terms of the understanding between us. If you desire to go out on the road, we will hold your place open for you for any reasonable time.

"Yours truly,

"VERSTEEG SHOE COMPANY."

Other correspondence and negotiations looking to a continuance of the relations of the parties followed, but they were unable to come to terms and the result of the disagreement was the present action, in which the plaintiff seeks in the first count of his petition to recover on the contract of February 5, 1900, what he would have earned if that contract had been...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT