700 Fed.Appx. 664 (9th Cir. 2017), 16-35297, Strong v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.

Docket Nº:16-35297
Citation:700 Fed.Appx. 664
Party Name:Mary STRONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC.; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Attorney:Mary Strong, Pro Se James Phillip Laurick, Trial Attorney, Kilmer Voorhees & Laurick, P.C., Portland, OR, Kasey Curtis, Reed Smith LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Elena O. Gekker, Reed Smith LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Appellee Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. James Phillip Laurick, Trial Attorney, K...
Judge Panel:Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Case Date:August 17, 2017
Court:United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
 
FREE EXCERPT

Page 664

700 Fed.Appx. 664 (9th Cir. 2017)

Mary STRONG, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC.; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-35297

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

August 17, 2017

Submitted August 9, 2017 [*]

Editorial Note:

Governing the citation to unpublished opinions please refer to federal rules of appellate procedure rule 32.1. See also U.S.Ct. of App. 9th Cir. Rule 36-3.

Page 665

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Michael J. McShane, District Judge, Presiding, D.C. Nos. 6:16-cv-00233-MC, 6:16-cv-00331-MC

Mary Strong, Pro Se

James Phillip Laurick, Trial Attorney, Kilmer Voorhees & Laurick, P.C., Portland, OR, Kasey Curtis, Reed Smith LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Elena O. Gekker, Reed Smith LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Appellee Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.

James Phillip Laurick, Trial Attorney, Kilmer Voorhees & Laurick, P.C., Portland, OR, for Defendants-Appellees Bank of America, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Freddie Mac, Bank of America, N.A., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.

Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Page 666

MEMORANDUM[**]

Mary Strong appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing her diversity action related to mortgage loans on her real property. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 656 F.3d 1034, 1040 (9th Cir. 2011) (dismissal under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6)); Mayfield v. United States, 599 F.3d 964, 970 (9th Cir. 2010) (standing). We may affirm on any basis supported by the record. Johnson v. Riverside Healthcare Sys., LP, 534 F.3d 1116, 1121 (9th Cir. 2008). We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand.

The district court properly dismissed Strong’s intentional infliction of emotional distress and fraud claims because Strong failed to allege facts sufficient to state plausible claims for relief. See Babick v. Or . Arena Corp., 333 Or. 401, 40 P.3d 1059, 1063 (2002) (setting forth elements of intentional infliction of...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP