Hagen v. Traill County

Decision Date06 June 1983
Docket NumberNo. 82-1785,82-1785
Citation708 F.2d 347
PartiesAlfred HAGEN, Appellant, v. TRAILL COUNTY, a political subdivision, Donna Oelrich, County Treasurer, Traill County, Traill County Board of Health, Stewart A. Larson, Chairman, Del Hvlinka, Marilyn Holo, Caledonia Township, a political subdivision, Board of Supervisors of Caledonia Township, Willard McDonald, Chairman, Earl Cuthbertson, Bernard Wright, Appellees.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit

Nicholas J. Spaeth, Vogel, Brantner, Kelly, Knutson, Weir & Bye, Ltd., Fargo, N.D., and Ronald H. McLean, Steven K. Aakre of Tenneson, Serkland, Lundberg, Erickson & Marcil, Ltd., Fargo, N.D., for appellees.

Gary K. Wood, Stone, Ribble, Bremseth, Meyer & Wood, Minneapolis, Minn., Alan J. Sheppard, Fargo, N.D., for appellant.

Before LAY, Chief Judge, JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge, and ROBERTS, District Judge. *

PER CURIAM.

Alfred Hagen filed this action against Traill County and Caledonia Township and their various officials alleging a claim for damages under 42 U.S.C. Secs. 1985 and 1983 for destroying his buildings and personal property without affording him federal due process. 1 The district court granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing Hagen's complaint. We affirm.

Hagen is the owner of three lots of real estate in Caledonia Township, Traill County, North Dakota, which contained unoccupied buildings and personal property. After receiving complaints from Hagen's neighbors that the property was a health hazard, Traill County and Caledonia Township officials gave Hagen oral and written notice that the land and buildings were a health hazard and instructed him to abate the hazards or the property would be destroyed. Hagen attended a meeting of the Caledonia Township Board of Supervisors on April 9, 1979, and was allowed to discuss the condition of the parcel with the township supervisors. After Hagen was again notified on July 25, 1979, and had discussed the matter with the Traill County State's Attorney on August 15, 1979, Caledonia Township abated the nuisance and buried the debris.

Hagen claims he was not given adequate procedural protection in that he was given insufficient notice and hearing prior to destruction of his mobile home and its contents by the county. See Pioneer Savings & Loan Co. v. City of Cleveland, 479 F.2d 595 (6th Cir.1973); Miles v. District of Columbia, 510 F.2d 188 (D.C.Cir.1975); Traylor v. City of Amarillo, 492 F.2d 1156 (5th Cir.1974); see also Schroeder v. City of New York, 371 U.S. 208, 83 S.Ct. 279, 9 L.Ed.2d 255 (1962). The record shows, however, as the district court found, that Hagen was notified by letters dated May 1978 and March 1979 to clean up the property or the buildings would be destroyed. He appeared before the township board on April 9, 1979, and the chairman of the County Board of Health on August 15, 1979. Further, as found by the district court, the notice of July 25, 1979, which was personally served on Hagen and which informed him that if he did not clean up the property by August 20, 1979, the property would be removed, clearly apprised Hagen of the circumstances and immediate threat to his property. At no time did Hagen request further hearings on the matter. After numerous warnings, Hagen failed to take any actions to abate the nuisance. We...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Pierce v. Village of Divernon, Ill.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit
    • 3 Marzo 1994
    ...request either a further hearing or reconsideration by the Village Board of its public nuisance declaration. See Hagen v. Traill County, 708 F.2d 347, 348 (8th Cir.1983). Indeed, the Pierces raise no objection to the Village Board's conclusion that the fire-damaged property constituted a pu......
  • Hansen v. City of Superior
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Nebraska
    • 21 Agosto 2020
    ...nuisance pursuant to the condemnation notice." Samuels v. Meriwether, 94 F.3d 1163, 1166-67 (8th Cir. 1996); see Hagen v. Traill County, 708 F.2d 347, 348 (8th Cir. 1983) (in nuisance abatement case, county and city officials provided adequate procedural protection to plaintiff prior to des......
  • Samuels v. Meriwether
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • 30 Agosto 1996
    ...due process violation occurs when the municipality abates the nuisance pursuant to the condemnation notice. Hagen v. Traill County, 708 F.2d 347, 348 (8th Cir.1983) (per curiam) (upheld legality of destruction of building for failure to abate nuisance after notice and The City destroyed the......
  • Jerome v. City of St. Paul
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Minnesota
    • 9 Septiembre 2014
    ...occurs when the municipality abates the nuisance pursuant to the condemnation notice." Id. at 1166-67 (citing Hagen v. Traill County, 708 F.2d 347, 348 (8th Cir. 1983)). In their briefing, Jerome and Samatar do not argue that the city failed to provide them with notice of the abatement or t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT