Jean v. Nelson

Citation714 F.2d 96
Decision Date16 August 1983
Docket NumberNo. 82-5772,82-5772
PartiesMarie Lucie JEAN, et al., Plaintiffs, Lucien Louis, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, Cross-Appellants, State of Florida, Intervenor-Appellant, v. Alan C. NELSON, et al., Defendants-Appellants, Cross-Appellees.
CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (11th Circuit)

Stanley Marcus, U.S. Atty., Sonia O'Donnell, Leon B. Kellner, Asst. U.S. Attys., Miami, Fla., Robert L. Bombaugh, William French Smith, Atty. Gen., Rudolph W. Giuliani, Associate Atty. Gen., Barbara L. Herwig, Michael Jay Singer, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs.

Kurzban & Kurzban, Miami, Fla., Ira J. Kurzban, Mary Gilmore and Terrence A. Corrigan, New York City, Michael J. Rosen, Miami, Fla., F/HAITIAN REFUGEE CENTER: Vera Weisz, Haitian Refugee Center, Inc., Miami, Fla., Bruce J. Winick, ACLU Foundation of Fla., Inc., Irwin P. Stotzky, Univ. of Miami, School of Law, Coral Gables, Fla., for plaintiffs-appellees, cross-appellants.

J. Kendrick Tucker, Deputy Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Fla., for intervenor-appellant.

Christopher Keith Hall, Coral Gables, Fla., for defendants-appellants, cross-appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion April 12, 1983, 11 Cir., 1983, 711 F.2d 1455).

Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, and RONEY, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HENDERSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • McCleskey v. Zant
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Georgia
    • February 1, 1984
    ...when appropriate the court may draw upon Title VII cases. Jean v. Nelson, 711 F.2d 1455, 1486 n. 30 (11th Cir.), reh'g en banc granted, 714 F.2d 96 (1983). Generally it is said that once the plaintiff has put on a prima facie statistical case, the burden shifts to the defendant to go forwar......
  • Jean v. Nelson
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • February 28, 1984
    ...that the government's actions were the product of discriminatory intent. Jean v. Nelson, 711 F.2d 1455, reh'g en banc granted, 714 F.2d 96 (11th Cir.1983). We now reverse and remand for further findings by the district court. Because the facts of this case have been extensively set forth in......
  • Vencor, Inc. v. Shalala
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Georgia
    • December 23, 1997
    ...in this case, reversing the long-standing old policy and instituting the new policy `is clearly a rule'"), reh'g en banc granted, 714 F.2d 96 (11th Cir.1983), vacated, 727 F.2d 957 (11th Cir. 1984) (dismissing appeal on APA issue as moot since government had issued new regulations in accord......
  • Fernandez-Roque v. Smith, FERNANDEZ-ROQUE
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • June 1, 1984
    ...this court drew a similar distinction between parole and admission. Jean v. Nelson, 711 F.2d 1455, 1484-85, reh'g en banc granted, 714 F.2d 96 (11th Cir.1983). The en banc court disagreed with this portion of the panel opinion. Jean v. Nelson, 727 F.2d 957, 969 (11th Cir.1984) (en banc). Af......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT