725 Fed.Appx. 789 (11th Cir. 2018), 17-13636, Gilbert v. Daniels
|Citation:||725 Fed.Appx. 789|
|Opinion Judge:||PER CURIAM:|
|Party Name:||Elisha GILBERT, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frederick L. DANIELS, Jr., Chairman, DeKalb County, Barbara Babbit Kaufman, Vice Chairman, Fulton County, Harold Buckley, Sr., Treasurer, DeKalb County, Juanita Jones Abernathy, Secretary, City of Atlanta, Robert L. Ashe, III, City of Atlanta, et al., Defendants-Appellees.|
|Attorney:||Elisha Gilbert, Jr., Pro Se Vincent D. Hyman, Marta Law Department, Atlanta, GA, for Defendants-Appellees Frederick L. Daniels, Jr., Barbara Babbit Kaufman, Harold Buckley, Sr., Juanita Jones Abernathy, Robert L. Ashe, III Dominique Annida Martinez, Laura L. Moore, Fulton County Attorneys Office...|
|Judge Panel:||Before TJOFLAT, ROSENBAUM, and NEWSOM, Circuit Judges.|
|Case Date:||February 14, 2018|
|Court:||United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit|
DO NOT PUBLISH. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 32.1. See also U.S.Ct. of App. 11th Cir. Rule 36-2.)
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cv-01623-TWT
Elisha Gilbert, Jr., Pro Se
Vincent D. Hyman, Marta Law Department, Atlanta, GA, for Defendants-Appellees Frederick L. Daniels, Jr., Barbara Babbit Kaufman, Harold Buckley, Sr., Juanita Jones Abernathy, Robert L. Ashe, III
Dominique Annida Martinez, Laura L. Moore, Fulton County Attorneys Office, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellee John H. Eaves
Terri N. Gordon, Shaheem Malik Williams, DeKalb County Law Department, Decatur, GA, for Defendants-Appellees Alvin T. Wong, Wayne M. Purdom, Sherry Boston, Lisa E. Bobb, Burrell Ellis, Jeff Rader, Melanie F. Wilson, L. Jackson, William OBrien
Valorri Jones, Camille Small-Simon, Vera June Starks, City of Atlanta Law Department, Atlanta, GA, for Defendants-Appellees Kasim Reed, Elaine L Carlisle, Patrick Labat, Raines F. Carter, Darryl Ferguson
Before TJOFLAT, ROSENBAUM, and NEWSOM, Circuit Judges.
Elisha Gilbert, Jr., filed a pro se lawsuit against thirty or so defendants arising out of his July 2012 arrest at the Five Points MARTA Station in Atlanta, Georgia. The defendants filed motions to dismiss on various grounds, and the district court dismissed the action in a brief order. On appeal, we found that Gilberts complaint was a "shotgun pleading" that did not give fair notice of its claims, but we concluded that the court did not adequately explain its reasons for dismissal and that Gilbert was probably entitled to at least one chance to amend his complaint. Gilbert v. Daniels, 624 Fed.Appx. 716 (11th Cir. 2015). Accordingly, we "vacate[d] the dismissal of Gilberts complaint and we remand[ed] for the district court to develop the record and determine, in the first instance, whether Gilbert should be instructed to replead his claims or whether amendment would be futile." Id. at 718.
After the case was returned on remand, the district court, consistent with our mandate, granted the defendants motions to dismiss on the ground that the complaint was a shotgun pleading. The court then ordered Gilbert to file within 28 days an...
To continue readingFREE SIGN UP