Stonewall Ins. Co. v. Asbestos Claims Management Corp.

Decision Date13 December 1995
Docket NumberNo. 1300,D,1300
Citation73 F.3d 1178
PartiesSTONEWALL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, v. ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Underwriters at Lloyds, Continental Casualty Company, American Motorists Insurance Company, Affiliated FM Insurance Company, Republic Insurance Company, First State Insurance Company, United States Fire Insurance Company, Houston General Insurance Company, Twin City Fire Insurance Company, Old Republic Insurance Company, American Centennial Insurance Company, The Constitution State Insurance Company, Employers Insurance of Wausau, and Commercial Union Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees, and The Travelers Insurance Company, et al., Defendants. ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, Third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Third-Party-Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, and H.S. Weavers (Underwriting) Agencies, Ltd., Third-Party Defendant. ockets 93-7314(L), 93-7380CON, 93-7382CON, 93-7386CON, 93-7388CON, 93-7390CON, 93-7392CON, 93-7396CON, 93-7398CON, 93-7400CON, 93-7402CON, 93-7404XAP, 93-7406CON, 93-7408CON, 93-7412CON, 94-7030XAP, 94-7034XAP, 94-7036XAP, 94-7040XAP, 94-7042XAP, 94-7044XAP, 94-7046XAP, 94-7048XAP, 94-7050XAP, 94-7052XAP, 94-7054XAP, 94-7056XAP, 94-7058XAP, 94-7060XAP, 94-7062XAP, 94-7064XAP, 94-7066XAP, 94-7068XAP, 94-7070XAP, 94-7072XAP, 94-7074XAP, 94-7076XAP, 94-7078XAP, 94-7080XAP and 94-7082XAP.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit

James W. Christie, Philadelphia, Pa. (James A.A. Pabarue, Rex F. Brien, Lynne A. Sitarski, Christie, Pabarue, Mortensen and Young; Nelson F. Barry, Bishop, Barry, Howe, Haney & Ryder, San Francisco, Cal., on the brief), for defendant-appellant-cross-appellee Commercial Union Insurance Company.

David F. Abernethy, Wilson M. Brown, III, Philadelphia, Pa., Charles K. O'Neill, New York City (Lawrence A. Nathanson, Drinker Biddle & Reath, Philadelphia, Pa.; Theresa W. Hajost, John W. Scott, Chadbourne & Parke, New York City, on the briefs), for defendants-appellants-cross-appellees Republic Insurance Company and American Motorists Insurance Company.

Charles A. Booth, New York City (J. Katherine Scott, Suzanne M. Bernard, Justin N. Kinney, Ford Marrin Esposito Witmeyer & Gleser, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellant-cross-appellee Continental Casualty Company.

David Holmes, New York City (Leonard A. Sheft, Sheft & Sheft, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant-cross-appellee Stonewall Insurance Company.

Barry R. Ostrager, New York City (Jonathan P. Rich, Jean A. Andrews, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellant-cross-appellee The Constitution State Insurance Company.

Thomas M. Reiter, Donald E. Seymour, Kirkpatrick & Lockhart, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Gail Kamnitz, Kirkpatrick & Lockhart, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee-cross-appellant Asbestos Claims Management Corporation.

Mary Ann D'Amato, George L. Maniatis, Mendes & Mount, New York City, submitted a brief for defendant-appellant-cross-appellee London Market Insurers.

James vanR. Springer, Howard Schiffman, Melinda Burrows, Dickstein, Shapiro & Morin, Washington, D.C., submitted a brief for defendant-appellant-cross-appellee Affiliated FM Insurance Company.

Kevin Barry McHugh, Costello Shea & Gaffney, New York City, submitted a brief for defendant-appellant-cross-appellee Houston General Insurance Company.

Edwin L. Smith, Joy R. Simon, Smith & Laquercia, P.C., New York City, submitted a brief for defendant-appellant-cross-appellee Old Republic Insurance Company.

Kevin W. Wolff, McElroy, Deutsch & Mulvaney, Morristown, N.J., submitted a brief for defendant-appellant-cross-appellee United States Fire Insurance Company and third-party-defendant-appellant-cross-appellee International Insurance Company.

Paul Verbesey, Kramer Martynetz & Verbesey, New York City, submitted a brief for defendant-appellant-cross-appellee Employers Insurance of Wausau.

Eugene R. Anderson, Anderson Kill Olick & Oshinsky, New York City; Martha Churchill, Mid-America Legal Foundation, Chicago, Ill., submitted a brief for amicus curiae Mid-America Legal Foundation.

Laura A. Foggan, Marilyn E. Kerst, Dennis A. Tosh, Wiley, Rein & Fielding, Washington, D.C., submitted a brief for amicus curiae Insurance Environmental Litigation Ass'n.

Robert N. Sayler, William F. Greaney, Rebecca S. Campbell, Covington & Burling, Washington, D.C.; Kurt W. Melchior, Nossaman, Guthner, Knox & Elliott, San Francisco, Cal.; Tom F. Freeman, David M. Halbreich, Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, San Francisco, Cal.; Anthony Bartell, McArthur & English, Newark, N.J., submitted briefs for amici curiae Armstrong World Industries, Inc., The Flintkote Company, Western Mac-Arthur Company, and Owens-Illinois, Inc.

                                                   Contents
                Glossary ................................................................. 1186
                Background ............................................................... 1187
                    I. Asbestos Claims Against NGC and NGC's Insurance Policies .......... 1187
                       A.   Bodily Injury and Property Damage Claims ..................... 1187
                       B.   NGC's Insurance Program ...................................... 1187
                       C.   The ACF and CCR Claims-Handling Facilities ................... 1188
                       D.   NGC's Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Reorganization ................... 1189
                   II.  Procedural Background and Rulings ................................. 1189
                       A.   Pretrial Proceedings ......................................... 1189
                       B.   Jury Trial and Bench Trial Proceedings ....................... 1190
                       C.   Judgments and Permission to Appeal ........................... 1191
                Discussion ............................................................... 1191
                    I. Summary of Holdings ............................................... 1191
                   II.  Issues Related to Coverage for Bodily Injury Claims ............... 1192
                       A.   Bodily Injury Trigger of Coverage ............................ 1192
                            1. Policy Language ........................................... 1192
                            2. NGC's and Insurers' Positions ............................. 1192
                            3. Jury and Bench Trial Decisions ............................ 1193
                            4. New York and Texas Case Law ............................... 1194
                            5. Evidence on Etiology of Asbestos Diseases ................. 1197
                               (a)  Asbestosis and Pleural Plaques ....................... 1197
                               (b)  Asbestos-Induced Cancers ............................. 1198
                            6. Coverage for Injury Resulting from Exposure to Other
                                 Manufacturers' Products ................................. 1200
                            7. Estoppel From Applying Standard Trigger of Coverage to
                                 Certain 1983-85 Excess Policies ......................... 1201
                       B.   Scope of Responsibility for Claims Triggering Multiple
                              Policies ................................................... 1201
                       C.   "Expected or Intended" Injuries .............................. 1204
                       D.   The Wellington and CCR Issues ................................ 1206
                  III.  Issues Related to Coverage for Property Damage Claims ............. 1208
                       A.   Existence of Property Damage ................................. 1208
                       B.   Property Damage Trigger of Coverage .......................... 1209
                       C.   "Business Risk" Property Damage Exclusions ................... 1210
                       D.   Number of Occurrences ........................................ 1212
                   IV.  Issues Related to Coverage for All Claims ......................... 1214
                       A.   "Known Loss" Defense ......................................... 1214
                       B.   Aggregate Policy Limits of Short-Term Policies ............... 1216
                       C.   Excess Policy Defense Obligations ............................ 1218
                       D.   Insurers' Peremptory Jury Challenges ......................... 1219
                Conclusion                                                                 1219
                                                   Glossary
                ACF ......... Asbestos Claims Facility
                ACIC ........ American Centennial Insurance Co
                ACMC ........ Asbestos Claims Management Corp
                ACMs ........ Asbestos-Containing Materials
                AHP ......... American Home Products Corp. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 748
                                F.2d 760 (2d Cir.1984)
                AMICO ....... American Motorists Insurance Co
                BI .......... Bodily Injury
                CCC ......... Continental Casualty Co
                CCR ......... Center for Claims Resolution
                CGL ......... Comprehensive General Liability
                CSIS ........ The Constitution State Insurance Co.
                CU .......... Commercial Union Insurance Co.
                NGC ......... National Gypsum Co.
                OR .......... Old Republic Insurance Co.
                PD .......... Property Damage
                

Before: NEWMAN, Chief Judge, WINTER and MAHONEY, Circuit Judges.

JON O. NEWMAN, Chief Judge:

These consolidated appeals and cross-appeals present numerous issues concerning liability insurance coverage in the context of claims for personal injury and property damage arising from exposure to asbestos. The principal issue is to determine the relevant time period or periods for which liability insurance coverage is available to a former asbestos product manufacturer confronted with thousands of asbestos-related claims, where the policies at issue are triggered not by the assertion of a claim against the insured but by the occurrence of bodily injury or property damage during the policy period.

National Gypsum Company ("NGC"), now Asbestos Claims Management Corporation ("ACMC"), 1 and a number of its liability insurers (collectively referred to as "the Insurers") sought declaratory relief clarifying the extent to which NGC is entitled to indemnification for claims...

To continue reading

Request your trial
209 cases
  • Prudential Lines Inc., In re
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • 5 Octubre 1998
    ...to the event for which the insured is held liable, not some point further back in the causal chain. Stonewall Ins. Co. v. Asbestos Claims Management Corp., 73 F.3d 1178, 1213 (2d Cir.1995) (quoting Arthur A. Johnson Corp., 7 N.Y.2d at 228, 196 N.Y.S.2d at 683, 164 N.E.2d 704) (emphasis adde......
  • Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc. v. Hiscox Ins. Co., 6:20-CV-06025 EAW
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of New York
    • 11 Junio 2020
    ...orders that it would eventually face over 30 civil lawsuits filed by different state entities. See Stonewall Ins. Co. v. Asbestos Claims Mgmt. Corp. , 73 F.3d 1178, 1215 (2d Cir. 1995) ("Though [the insured] was aware, prior to the inception of many of the policies, that its products risked......
  • Hsb Group, Inc. v. Svb Underwriting, Ltd.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Connecticut
    • 30 Septiembre 2009
    ...it was more probable than not that it would be sued did not defeat coverage or a duty to defend); Stonewall Ins. Co. v. Asbestos Claims Mgmt. Corp., 73 F.3d 1178, 1214-15 (2d Cir.1995) (rejecting the known loss doctrine as a defense where the insured was aware prior to the inception of the ......
  • Hopeman Bros., Inc. v. Cont'l Cas. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Virginia
    • 2 Abril 2018
    ...that the obligation to reimburse defense costs follows the indemnity obligations as a matter of law. Stonewall Ins. Co. v. Asbestos Claims Mgmt. Corp., 73 F.3d 1178, 1219 (2d Cir. 1995) (affirming the district court's ruling that "under policies containing a duty to reimburse defense costs ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Mold: 5 Reasons Why It Is Not The 'Next Asbestos'
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • 31 Julio 2002
    ...Inc. v. United Ins. Co., 650 A. 2d 974 (N.J. 1994); Stonewall Insurance Company v. Asbestos Claims Management Corporation, 73 F. 3d 1178 (2d Cir. Center for Disease Control, "Questions and Answers on Stachybotrys chartarum and other molds," available at www.cdc.gov/nceh/airpollution/mold/st......
11 books & journal articles
  • Chapter 3
    • United States
    • Full Court Press Business Insurance
    • Invalid date
    ...already paid on the loss or for the insured’s behalf.” See also: Second Circuit: Stonewell Insurance Co. v. Asbestos Claims Management, 73 F.3d 1178 (2d Cir. 1995), modified and reh’g denied 85 F.3d 49 (2d Cir. 1996) (prorating entire loss among all triggered policies). Third Circuit: Koppe......
  • CHAPTER 3 The Insurance Contract
    • United States
    • Full Court Press Insurance for Real Estate-Related Entities
    • Invalid date
    ...already paid on the loss or for the insured’s behalf.” See also: Second Circuit: Stonewell Insurance Co. v. Asbestos Claims Management, 73 F.3d 1178 (2d Cir. 1995), modified and reh’g denied 85 F.3d 49 (2d Cir. 1996) (prorating entire loss among all triggered policies). Third Circuit: Koppe......
  • Chapter 5
    • United States
    • Full Court Press Business Insurance
    • Invalid date
    ...Century Indemnity Co., 559 F.3d 57 (1st Cir. 2009) (environmental). Second Circuit: Stonewell Insurance Co. v. Asbestos Claims Management, 73 F.3d 1178 (2d Cir. 1995), modified and rehearing denied 85 F.3d 49 (2d Cir. 1996) (asbestos bodily injury). Third Circuit: Koppers Co. v. Aetna Casua......
  • CHAPTER 8
    • United States
    • Full Court Press Zalma on Property and Casualty Insurance
    • Invalid date
    ...may not obtain insurance to cover a loss that is known before the policy takes effect.” Stonewall Ins. Co. v. Asbestos Claims Mgt. Corp., 73 F.3d 1178, 1214 (2d Cir. 1995), modified on other grounds, 85 F.3d 49 (2d Cir. 1996); see also Henry Modell & Co. v. Gen. Ins. Co. of Trieste & Venice......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT