Bothke v. Fluor Engineers and Constructors, Inc.

Decision Date03 August 1984
Docket NumberNo. 81-5457,81-5457
Citation739 F.2d 484
Parties84-2 USTC P 9724 Hans BOTHKE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FLUOR ENGINEERS AND CONSTRUCTORS, INC., et al., Defendants, and W.J. Terry, Defendant-Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

Hans Bothke, in pro. per.

Jonathan S. Cohen, John Dudeck, Jr., Washington, D.C., for defendant-appellee.

Before WRIGHT, KENNEDY, and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Following our opinion in Bothke v. Fluor Engineers, et al. and W.J. Terry, 713 F.2d 1405, certiorari was granted by the Supreme Court, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 3566, 82 L.Ed.2d 867. On July 2, 1984, that Court vacated the judgment and remanded to this court for further consideration in light of Davis v. Scherer, 468 U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 3012, 82 L.Ed.2d 139 (1984).

The cause is now remanded to the district court for the purpose of determining whether Terry is qualifiedly immune in accordance with the standards set forth in Davis v. Scherer.

Unless plaintiff-appellant Bothke can meet the burden of showing a violation of constitutional rights that were clearly established at the time of the conduct at issue, the district court will enter a judgment of dismissal.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Bothke v. Fluor Engineers & Constructors, Inc., 85-6361
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • December 16, 1987
    ...a violation of constitutional rights that were clearly established at the time of the conduct at issue." Bothke v. Fluor Engineers & Constructors, Inc., 739 F.2d 484 (1984) (Bothke II ). 3. On Remand to the District On remand, the district court appointed a magistrate who heard testimony an......
  • Elder v. Holloway
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • September 17, 1992
    ...the time of the incident since Davis v. Scherer, 468 U.S. 183, 104 S.Ct. 3012, 82 L.Ed.2d 139 (1984), and Bothke v. Fluor Eng'rs and Constructors, Inc., 739 F.2d 484 (9th Cir.1984), following Davis in this circuit. In Davis, the Supreme Court held that "[a] plaintiff who seeks damages for v......
  • Hollett v. Browning
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
    • November 30, 1988
    ... ... Baddour, Inc. v. United States, 802 F.2d 801, 807-809 (5th Cir. 1986); ... In the last of the opinions in Bothke v. Fluor Engineers and Constructors, Inc., 713 F.2d 1405 ... ...
  • US v. Toyota of Visalia
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
    • June 13, 1991
    ... ... and denies summary judgment for Toyota of Visalia, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Toyota) for the reasons set ...         Citing Bothke v. Fluor Engineers and Constructors, Inc., 713 F.2d 1405, ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT