Kennedy v. Uphoff

• Decision Date: 29 November 1993
• Citation: 74 F.3d 1249
• Parties: NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of
• Court: U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit

Page 1249

74 F.3d 1249

NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

Ronald Leroy KENNEDY, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Tommy F. Lawver, Plaintiff, v. Judith UPHOFF, Director; Robert Ortega, Deputy Director; Jim Ferguson, Warden; Scott Abbott, Officer; Jeff Tromburg, Officer, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-8056.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Jan. 5, 1996.

Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, McKAY and HENRY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT ¹

McKAY, Circuit Judge.

After examining Appellant's brief and the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

We AFFIRM for the reasons given in the magistrate judge's report which was adopted by the district court. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

1 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.