United States v. Ross

Citation741 F.3d 743
Decision Date19 December 2013
Docket NumberNo. 13–2015.,13–2015.
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Earl E. ROSS, Jr., Defendant–Appellant.
CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Editor's Note: The opinion of the United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, in U.S. v. Ross, published in the advance sheet at this citation, 741 F.3d 743, was withdrawn from the bound volume because it is an order not intended for publication in the Federal Reporter. It will be republished in the Federal Appendix. See 2013 WL 8335214.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • United States v. Clayton
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Wisconsin
    • January 24, 2022
    ...... finds this statement immaterial to whether probable cause. existed to search the residence. Therefore, it is unnecessary. to further consider whether the agents' warrantless entry. to the home was unlawful. Cf. United States v. Ross ,. 741 F.3d 743, 748 (7th Cir. 2013) (noting that exigent. circumstances may exist if there is “a need to prevent. the imminent destruction of evidence”); United. States v. Henderson , 748 F.3d 788, 791 (7th Cir. 2014). (discussing a protective sweep). . ......
  • United States v. Crawford-Stark
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Wisconsin
    • December 10, 2019
    ...such "exigent circumstances" exist where there is a need to prevent the imminent destruction of evidence. See, e.g., United States v. Ross, 741 F.3d 743, 748 (7th Cir. 2013); United States v. Lenoir, 318 F.3d 725, 730 (7th Cir. 2003). When determining whether exigent circumstances exist, th......
  • United States v. Duncan
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Wisconsin
    • October 20, 2021
    ...... information they had received, it was reasonable for the. officers to enter the residence and perform a limited. protective sweep to ensure an armed person was not lurking. while they conducted their investigation.” Id. . at 14 (citing United States v. Ross , 741 F.3d 743,. 748 (7th Cir. 2013); United States v. Kempf , 400. F.3d 501, 503 (7th Cir. 2005); United States v. Taylor , 179 Fed.Appx. 957, 959 (7th Cir. 2006);. United States v. Craig , 12 F.3d 1101, at *6 (7th. Cir. 1993)). Judge Duffin found that though the ......
  • Simmons v. Napier
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit)
    • September 16, 2015
    ...... DIANNA NAPIER, MUSA MAHOI, and DAVID VILLEROT, Defendants-Appellees. No. 14-2013 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT September 16, 2015 NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT