Schulte v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Ry. Co.

Citation76 Mo. 324
PartiesSCHULTE v. THE ST. LOUIS, IRON MOUNTAIN & SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant.
Decision Date31 October 1882
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Missouri

Appeal from Madison Circuit Court.--HON. J. H. NICHOLSON, Judge.

REVERSED.

T. J. Portis and Smith & Krauthoff for appellant.

E. D. Anthony and W. N. Nalle for respondent.

NORTON, J.

This was a suit instituted before a justice of the peace to recover damages under the 43rd section of Railroad Law, (Wag. Stat., p. 310,) for stock injured and killed by defendant's locomotive. Upon trial in the circuit court of Madison county, where the case had been taken by appeal, plaintiff had judgment, from which defendant has appealed.

On the trial defendant objected to the introduction of any evidence on the ground that the statement did not set forth a cause of action. This objection was overruled and this action assigned for error. In the case of Rowland v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern R'y Co., 73 Mo. 619, it was held that a statement, to be sufficient under the said 43rd section, must aver that the stock were not killed within the limits of an incorporated town. Testing the sufficiency of the statement in this case by the above rule, the judgment must be reversed because of the lack of such an averment in the statement.

Inasmuch as it was held in the same case that when it is evident that the statement filed before the justice in an action against a railroad company, for killing stock, is intended to be brought under the 43rd section of the Railroad Law, any insufficiency in the statement may be amended after the case has reached the circuit court, the cause will also be remanded, when the statement may be amended so as to conform to the rule laid down in the above case, as well as in the case of Bates v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern R'y Co., 74 Mo. 60.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded, in which all concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
27 cases
  • Ringo v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • May 16, 1887
    ...246; Nance v. Railroad, 79 Mo. 196; Manz v. Railroad, 87 Mo. 278; Morrow v. Railroad, 82 Mo. 169; Ather v. Railroad, 79 Mo. 432; Schultz v. Railroad, 76 Mo. 324; Hudgen Railroad, 79 Mo. 418; Bates v. Railroad, 74 Mo. 60. The evidence only shows where the plaintiff's animal was killed, which......
  • Kirn v. Cape Girardeau & Chester Railroad Company
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Missouri (US)
    • June 14, 1910
    ...Railroad, 26 Mo.App. 377; Summers v. Railroad, 29 Mo.App. 41; Jones v. Railroad, 52 Mo.App. 381; Morrow v. Railroad, 82 Mo. 169; Schulte v. Railroad, 76 Mo. 324; Davis Railroad, 65 Mo. 441; Rowland v. Railroad, 73 Mo. 619; Cunningham v. Railroad, 70 Mo. 202. (b) It fails to allege that the ......
  • Manz v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • October 31, 1885
    ...the company was by law required to fence. Moore v. R. R., 81 Mo. 499; Nance v. R. R., 79 Mo. 196; Hudgens v. R. R., 79 Mo. 418; Schulte v. R. R., 76 Mo. 324; Asher v. R. R., 79 Mo. 433; Morrow v. R. R., 82 Mo. 169. And it is immaterial at what point the animal was struck and killed by the l......
  • Ward v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • February 28, 1887
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT