Baskin v. Bogan

Decision Date04 September 2014
Docket Number14–2526.,14–2388,Nos. 14–2386,14–2387,s. 14–2386
Citation766 F.3d 648
PartiesMarilyn Rae BASKIN, et al., Plaintiffs–Appellees, v. Penny BOGAN, et al., Defendants–Appellants. Virginia Wolf, et al., v. Scott Walker, et al.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Held Unconstitutional

W.S.A. Const. Art. 13, § 13; West's A.I.C. 31–11–1–1Barbara Baird, Attorney, Law Office of Barbara J. Baird, Indianapolis, IN, Paul David Castillo, Attorney, Lambda Legal Defense & Education Fund, Incorporated, Dallas, TX, Jordan M. Heinz, Melanie MacKay, Brent P. Ray, Attorneys, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Chicago, IL, Dmitriy Tishyevich, Attorney, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, New York, N.Y., Camilla Taylor, Attorney, Lambda Legal Defense & Education Fund, Incorporated, Chicago, IL, for PlaintiffsAppellees, Docket No. 14–2386.

Thomas M. Fisher, Attorney, Office of the Attorney General, Indianapolis, IN, for

DefendantsAppellants Greg Zoeller and William C. Vanness, II, M.D., Docket No. 14–2386

Robert Victor Clutter, Attorney, Kirtley, Taylor, Sims, Chadd & Minnette, P.C., Lebanon, IN, for DefendantAppellant Penny Bogan, Docket No. 14–2386.

David Alan Robinson, Attorney, North Haven, CT, for Amicus Curiae David Robinson, Docket Nos. 14–2386, 14–2387 and 14–2388.

Michael Francisco, Attorney, Office of the Attorney General, Denver, CO, for Amicus Curiae State of Colorado, Docket Nos. 14–2386, 14–2387 and 14–2388.

Steven W. Fitschen, Attorney, National Legal Foundation, Virginia Beach, for Amicus Curiae Concerned Women for America, Docket Nos. 14–2386, 14–2387 and 14–2388.

Kevin Trent Snider, Attorney, Pacific Justice Institute, Sacremento, CA, for Amicus Curiae Paul McHugh, Docket Nos. 14–2386, 14–2387 and 14–2388.

Michael J. Cork, Attorney, Bamberger, Foreman, Oswald & Hahn, Indianapolis, IN, for Amicus Curiae Social Science Professors, Docket Nos. 14–2386, 14–2387 and 14–2388.

James Bopp, Jr., Attorney, Bopp Law Firm, Terre Haute, IN, for Amicus Curiae Helen M. Alvare, Docket Nos. 14–2386, 14–2387 and 14–2388.

Mary E. McAlister, Attorney, Liberty Counsel, Lynchburg, VA, for Amicus Curiae Liberty Counsel, Docket Nos. 14–2386, 14–2387 and 14–2388.

Dean John Sauer, Attorney, Clark & Sauer, LLC, St. Louis, MO, for Amicus Curiae 22 Scholars of Federalism and Judicial Restraint, Docket Nos. 14–2386, 14–2387 and 14–2388.

Eric C. Rassbach, Attorney, Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae Becket Fund Religious Liberty, Docket Nos. 14–2386, 14–2387 and 14–2388.

Jonathan Andrew Scruggs, Attorney, Alliance Defending Freedom, Scottsdale, AZ, for Amicus Curiae Alliance Defending Freedom, Docket Nos. 14–2386, 14–2387 and 14–2388.

Kenneth Alan Klukowski, Attorney, Family Research Council, for Amicus Curiae Robert P. George, Sherif Girgis and Ryan T. Anderson, Docket Nos. 14–2386, 14–2387 and 14–2388.

Richard Shawn Gunnarson, Attorney, Salt Lake City, UT, Carl H. Esbeck, Jefferey H. Moon, United States Catholic Conference, Washington, DC, Sherri Strand, Thompson Coburn LLP, St. Louis, MO, for Amicus Curiae United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, Docket Nos. 14–2386, 14–2387 and 14–2388.

Deborah Jane Dewart, Attorney, Deborah J. Dewart, Attorney at Law, Swansboro, NC, for Amicus Curiae North Carolina Value Caalition, Docket Nos. 14–2386, 14–2526, 14–2387 and 14–2388.

John W. Mauck, Attorney, Mauck & Baker, Chicago, IL, for Amicus Curiae Family–Pac Federal, Inc., Docket Nos. 14–2386, 14–2387 and 14–2388.

Benjamin G. Shatz, Attorney, Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Amicus Curiae Howard University School of Law Civil Rights Clinic, Docket Nos. 14–2386, 14–2387 and 14–2388.

Christopher Dowden Man, Attorney, Chadbourne & Parke, Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae Outserve–SLDN and American Military Partner Association, Docket Nos. 14–2386, 14–2387 and 14–2388.

Catherine E. Stetson, Attorney, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae Historians of Antigay Discrimination,Docket Nos. 14–2386, 14–2526, 14–2387 and 14–2388.

Jessica Weisel, Attorney, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, Los Angeles, CA, for Amicus Curiae Historians of Marriage, Docket Nos. 14–2386, 14–2387 and 14–2388.

George David Carter, Jr., Attorney, Innovista Law PLLC, Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae Retired Law Enforcement Officers and First Responders, Docket Nos. 14–2386, 14–2387 and 14–2388.

Elizabeth B. Wydra, Attorney, Constitutional Accountability Center, Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae Constitutional Accountability Center and Cato Institute, Docket Nos. 14–2386, 14–2387 and 14–2388.

Jeremy Cary Roth, Attorney, Munger, Tolles & Olson, San Francisco, CA, for Amicus Curiae Bay Area Lawyers for Individual Freedom, Docket Nos. 14–2386, 14–2387 and 14–2388.

Brad W. Seiling, Attorney, Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Amicus Curiae Gary Gates, Docket Nos. 14–2386, 14–2526, 14–2387 and 14–2388.

Ria Tabacco Mar, Attorney, NAACP Legal Defense & Education Fund, New York, N.Y., for Amicus Curiae NAACP Legal Defense & Education Fund, Inc., Docket Nos. 14–2386, 14–2526, 14–2387 and 14–2388.

Paul M. Smith, Attorney, Jenner & Block LLP, Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae American Psychological Association, Docket Nos. 14–2386, 14–2526, 14–2387 and 14–2388.

Jefferey S. Trachtman, Attorney, Kramer, Levin, Naftalis & Frankel, LLP, New York, N.Y., for Amicus Curiae Bishops of the Episcopal Church in Indianapolis and Milwaukee, Docket Nos. 14–2386, 14–2387 and 14–2388.

Sara Bartel, Attorney, Morrison & Foerster LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Amicus Curiae Joan Heifetz Hollinger, Docket Nos. 14–2386, 14–2526, 14–2387 and 14–2388.

Paul R.Q. Wolfson, Attorney, Wilmerhale, Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders, Docket Nos. 14–2386, 14–2387 and 14–2388.

Suzanne Goldberg, Attorney, Columbia University Law School, New York, N.Y., for Amicus Curiae Columbia Law School Sexuality and Gender Law Clinic, Docket Nos. 14–2386, 14–2526, 14–2387 and 14–2388.

Susan Baker Manning, Attorney, Bingham McCutchen LLP, Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae 23 Employers and Organizations Representing Employers, Docket Nos. 14–2386 and 14–2526.

Steven P. McKey, Attorney, Bryan Cave, LLP, Chicago, IL, for Amicus Curiae Family Equality Council, Docket Nos. 14–2386, 14–2526, 14–2387 and 14–2388.

Rocky Chiu–Feng Tsai, Attorney, Ropes & Gray, San Francisco, CA, for Amicus Curiae Anti–Defamation League, Docket Nos. 14–238, 14–2526, 14–2387 and 14–2388.

Diane M. Soubly, Attorney, Stevenson Keppelman Associates, Ann Arbor, MI, for Amicus Curiae Constitutional Law Scholars, Docket Nos. 14–2386, 14–2387 and 14–2388.

Emily Martin, Attorney, National Women's Law Center, Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae National Women's Law Center, Docket Nos. 14–2386, 14–2526, 14–2387 and 14–2388.

Frank Moon Dickerson, III, Hans Joseph Germann, Attorneys, Mayer Brown

LLP, Chicago, IL, Laurence Jacques Dupuis, Attorney, American Civil Liberty Union of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, James D. Esseks, Attorney, American Civil Liberties Union, New York, N.Y., Gretchen E. Helfrich, Attorney, Loevy & Loevy, Chicago, IL, John A. Knight, Attorney, Roger Baldwin Foundation of ACLU, Inc., Chicago, IL, for PlaintiffsAppellees, Docket No. 14–2526.

Timothy C. Samuelson, Thomas C. Bellavia, Clayton P. Kawski, Attorneys, Office of the Attorney General, Madison, WI, for DefendantsAppellants, Docket No. 14–2526.

John Paul Serketich, Attorney, Racine County Corporation Counsel, Racine, WI, for DefendantParty–in–Interest Wendy Christensen, Docket No. 14–2526.

Paul Bargren, Corporation Counsel, Office of the Corporation Counsel, Milwaukee, WI, for DefendantParty–in–Interest Joseph Czarnezki, Docket No. 14–2526.

David R. Gault, Assistant Corporation Counsel, Office of the Corporation Counsel, Madison, WI, for DefendantParty–in–Interest Scott McDonell, Docket No. 14–2526.

Michael D. Dean, Attorney, Brookfield, WI, for Party–in–Interest Julaine K. Appling, Docket No. 14–2526.

Andrew John Davis, Attorney, Folger & Levin LLP, San Francisco, CA for Amicus Curiae Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays, Inc., Docket No. 14–2526.

Benjamin G. Shatz, Attorney, Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Amicus Curiae J. Gary Gates, Docket No. 14–2526.

Sean C. Lemieux, Attorney, Lemieux Law, Indianapolis, IN, Chase Strangio, Attorney, American Civil Liberties Union, New York, N.Y., for PlaintiffsAppellees Midori Fujii, Melody Laybe, Tara Betterman and Scott Moubray–Carrico, Docket No. 14–2387.

Chase Strangio, American Civil Liberties Union, New York, N.Y., Kelly Eskew, Gavin M. Rose, Attorneys, ACLU of Indiana, Kenneth J. Falk, Attorney, Indiana Civil Liberties Union, Indianapolis, IN, for PlaintiffAppellee Monica Wehrle, Docket No. 14–2387.

Thomas M. Fisher, Attorney, Office of the Attorney General, Indianapolis, IN, for DefendantAppellant Commissioner of the Indiana State Department of Revenue, Docket No. 14–2387.

Thomas A. Hardin, Attorney, Shine & Hardin LLP, Fort Wayne, IN, for DefendantAppellant Clerk, Allen County, Indiana, Docket No. 14–2387.

Karen Celestino–Horseman, Attorney, William R. Groth, Attorney, Fillenwarth, Dennerline, Groth & Towe, LLP, Rob Katz, Attorney, Indiana University, Mark Sniderman, Attorney, Sniderman Nguyen LLP, Kathleen M. Sweeney, Attorney, Sweeney Hayes, LLC, Indianapolis, IN, for PlaintiffsAppellees, Docket No. 14–2388.

Thomas M. Fisher, Attorney, Office of the Attorney General, Indianapolis, IN, for DefendantsAppellants, Docket No. 14–2388.

Before POSNER, WILLIAMS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

POSNER, Circuit Judge.

Indiana and Wisconsin are among the shrinking majority of states that do not recognize the validity of same-sex marriages, whether contracted in these states or in states (or foreign countries) where they are lawful. The states have appealed from district court decisions invalidating the states' laws that ordain such refusal.

Formally these cases are about discrimination against the small homosexual minority in the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
81 cases
  • Bolden v. Jane Doe (In re Adoption J.S.), 20120751
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Utah
    • November 4, 2014
    ...as "a minor step" and a "simple, straightforward hurdle" that "countless unwed fathers have cleared"). 51. See, e.g., Baskin v. Bogan, 766 F.3d 648, 656 (7th Cir. 2014) ("When a statute discriminates against a protected class[,] . . . it doesn't matter whether the harm inflicted by the disc......
  • Hamby v. Parnell
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Alaska
    • October 12, 2014
    ...serves, or even acts as a detriment to, the general welfare.95 In regard to a parallel argument concerning tradition brought by the state in Baskin, the Seventh Circuit explained:The state's argument from tradition runs head on into Loving v. Virginia, since the limitation of marriage to pe......
  • Hively v. Ivy Tech Cmty. Coll. of Ind.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
    • April 4, 2017
    ...by the authors and ratifiers of Title VII. But today "sex" has a broader meaning than the genitalia you're born with. In Baskin v. Bogan , 766 F.3d 648 (7th Cir. 2014), our court, anticipating Obergefell by invalidating laws in Indiana and Wisconsin that forbade same-sex marriage, discussed......
  • Boyden v. Conlin, 17-cv-264-wmc
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Wisconsin
    • September 18, 2018
    ...(4) whether the class is politically powerless.Wolf v. Walker , 986 F.Supp.2d 982, 1012 (W.D. Wis. 2014), aff'd sub nom. Baskin v. Bogan , 766 F.3d 648 (7th Cir. 2014) (internal citation and quotation marks omitted). Based largely on the expert opinion of Dr. Mayer, defendants challenge whe......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
9 books & journal articles
  • Exploring Identity
    • United States
    • ABA General Library Family Law Quarterly No. 55-1, April 2020
    • April 1, 2020
    ...jurisdictions applied heightened scrutiny after determining that sexual orientation was an immutable characteristic. Baskin v. Bogan, 766 F.3d 648, 657 (7th Cir. 2014); Kerrigan v. Comm’r of Pub. Health, 957 A.2d 407, 438–39 (Conn. 2008); Varnum v. Brien, 763 N.W.2d 862, 893–94 (Iowa 2009);......
  • Community, Society, and Individualism in Constitutional Law
    • United States
    • Georgetown Law Journal No. 111-4, April 2023
    • April 1, 2023
    ...A. Posner, Eighteen Years On: A Re-Review , 125 YALE L.J. 533, 534, 536 (2015) (reviewing ESKRIDGE, JR., supra note 409); Baskin v. Bogan, 766 F.3d 648, 654, 658–59 (7th Cir. 2014). 427. See ESKRIDGE, JR. & SPEDALE, supra note 411, at 106–07 (“[S]tate endorsement of marriage in general does......
  • Equal Protection
    • United States
    • Georgetown Journal of Gender and the Law No. XXIII-2, January 2022
    • January 1, 2022
    ...352, 384 (4th Cir. 2014) (holding same-sex marriage ban unconstitutional in violation of the Equal Protection Clause); Baskin v. Bogan, 766 F.3d 648, 656 (7th Cir. 2014) (holding same-sex marriage ban unconstitutional). 275. See DeBoer v. Snyder, 772 F.3d 388 (6th Cir. 2014) (holding the ba......
  • THE UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES OF CHICKEN STEALING: SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND THE PATH TO POLYGAMY.
    • United States
    • Albany Law Review Vol. 84 No. 2, June 2021
    • June 22, 2021
    ...Cir. 2014); Bostic v. Schaefer, 760 F.3d 352, 367 (4th Cir. 2014); Latta v. Otter, 771 F.3d 456, 464-65 (9th Cir. 2014); Baskin v. Bogan, 766 F.3d 648, 653, 672 (7th Cir. (173) DeBoer v. Snyder, 772 F.3d 388 (6th Cir. 2014), rev'd sub nom Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015). The DeBoe......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT