Glock v. Moore
Decision Date | 05 January 2001 |
Docket Number | No. SC00-2432, No. SC00-2535. |
Citation | 776 So.2d 243 |
Parties | Robert D. GLOCK, II, Petitioner, v. Michael W. MOORE, Secretary, Department of Corrections, State of Florida, Respondent. Robert D. Glock, II, Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Terri L. Backhus of Backhus & Izakowitz, P.A., Tampa, FL, for Petitioner/Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Robert J. Landry and Scott A. Browne, Assistant Attorneys General, Tampa, FL, for Respondent/Appellee.
Robert D. Glock, a prisoner under sentence of death and scheduled for execution on January 11, 2001, appeals the trial court's order summarily denying his successive motion for postconviction relief. Glock also filed a separate petition for writ of habeas corpus in this Court. Both the successive motion and the petition were filed after the November 14, 2000, signing of the death warrant. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), (9), Fla. Const. For the reasons stated below, we affirm the trial court's order denying postconviction relief and we deny Glock's petition for writ of habeas corpus.
Glock was charged and convicted of first-degree murder, kidnapping, and robbery and was sentenced to death. We detailed the facts of this case in our initial opinion as follows:
Puiatti v. State, 495 So.2d 128, 129 (Fla. 1986), vacated in part, 481 U.S. 1027, 107 S.Ct. 1950, 95 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987).
Glock appealed his murder conviction and death sentence, but he did not appeal his convictions for kidnapping and robbery.2 We affirmed on direct appeal.3
. Thereafter, Governor Bob Martinez signed a death warrant, setting execution for January 17, 1989, and Glock filed a rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief in the trial court. The trial court summarily denied each of Glock's claims.4
See Glock v. Dugger, 537 So.2d 99 (Fla.1989). Glock appealed to this Court, and he also filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus and request for stay of execution. See id. at 100. As stated by this Court, Glock raised two principal claims: "(1) that the admission of codefendant Puiatti's confession violated Cruz v. New York, 481 U.S. 186, 107 S.Ct. 1714, 95 L.Ed.2d 162 (1987), and Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 88 S.Ct. 1620, 20 L.Ed.2d 476 (1968); and (2) that trial counsel was ineffective in failing to obtain additional information from Glock's family to aid the mental health experts in showing deficiencies in Glock's personality that affected Glock's confession and presentation of evidence in the penalty phase." Glock, 537 So.2d at 101-02. This Court rejected these claims, affirmed the trial court's summary denial of the 3.850 motion, denied the petition for writ of habeas corpus, and denied the stay of execution.5
See id. at 103.
Following this Court's 1989 decision, Glock sought relief in the federal courts by filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus, which the federal district court denied. See Glock v. Dugger, 752 F.Supp. 1027, 1031 (M.D.Fla.1990)
.6 On appeal, the Eleventh Circuit set aside the death sentence, finding that the trial court's jury instructions regarding the "heinous, atrocious and cruel" ("HAC") aggravator violated Glock's Eighth Amendment rights as interpreted by Espinosa v. Florida, 505 U.S. 1079, 112 S.Ct. 2926, 120 L.Ed.2d 854 (1992). See Glock v. Singletary, 36 F.3d 1014, 1027 (11th Cir.1994). Subsequently, the Eleventh Circuit reheard the case en banc and determined, based on an analysis of the principles announced in Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288, 109 S.Ct. 1060, 103 L.Ed.2d 334 (1989), that Glock was not entitled to the benefit of the retroactive application of Espinosa. See Glock v. Singletary, 65 F.3d 878, 890 (11th Cir.1995).7 The en banc Eleventh Circuit remanded the case to the Eleventh Circuit panel for consideration of Glock's other sentence-related challenges that the panel had not previously addressed. See id. at 891.
cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 121 S.Ct. 213, 148 L.Ed.2d 150 (2000). The magistrate issued a report and recommendation that the district court deny Glock's writ of habeas corpus. See id. The district court adopted the magistrate's report and recommendation, and denied the writ. Glock appealed to the Eleventh Circuit, which affirmed the district court's denial. See id. at 626.
Governor Bush signed Glock's death warrant on November 14, 2000, and execution was set for December 8, 2000. Glock thereafter filed an application for stay, which this Court granted, thereby staying execution to and including 6 p.m. on January 10, 2001. Execution was reset for January 11, 2001. On November 20, 2000, postconviction counsel served public records requests on a number of state agencies. On December 1, 2000, the trial court held a status hearing at which it ordered that Glock file his postconviction motion by December 4, 2000. Glock timely filed his motion and the trial court held a hearing on December 7, 2000, at which the court orally denied Glock's motion. The trial court entered its written order on December 18, 2000, and this appeal followed.
3.850 MOTION FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF
In his first...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Jackson v. State
...trial court asked the State to prepare a proposed order and Glock submitted objections to the State's proposed order."Glock v. Moore, 776 So. 2d 243, 248-49 (Fla. 2001). The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in Ammons v. Dade City, Fla., 783 F.2d 982 (11th Cir. 1986), ......
-
Jackson v. State
...trial court asked the State to prepare a proposed order and Glock submitted objections to the State's proposed order.”Glock v. Moore, 776 So.2d 243, 248–49 (Fla.2001). The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in Ammons v. Dade City, Fla., 783 F.2d 982 (11th Cir.1986), sta......
-
Windom v. State
...the case once, in describing the Eleventh Circuit's denial of habeas relief to a defendant sentenced to death. See Glock v. Moore, 776 So.2d 243, 248 (Fla.2001).31 We should now adopt Teague in cases considering the retroactivity of decisions of the United States Supreme Court. We should no......
-
Overton v. State, SC04-2071.
...records requests that are "overly broad, of questionable relevance, and unlikely to lead to discoverable evidence"); Glock v. Moore, 776 So.2d 243, 253 (Fla.2001) (explaining that the production of public records for capital postconviction proceedings is "not intended to be a procedure auth......
-
Florida's homestead realty: is it exempt from imposition of an equitable lien for nonpayment of alimony and child support?
...810 So. 2d 566 (Fla. 5th D.C.A. 2002); Partridge v. Partridge, 790 So. 2d 1280 (Fla. 4th D.C.A. 2002). (30) Id. (31) See Glock v. Moore, 776 So. 2d 243, 251 (Fla. 2001); Fredman v. Fredman, 960 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 2d D.C.A. 2007), rev. den., 968 So. 2d 556 (Fla. 2006). (32) See Murphy v. Farquh......