784 Fed.Appx. 288 (5th Cir. 2019), 19-10279, United States v. Marrs

• Citation: 784 Fed.Appx. 288
• Opinion Judge: PER CURIAM:
• Party Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Aaron Dewayne MARRS, Defendant-Appellant
• Attorney: Leigha Amy Simonton, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff - Appellee Aaron Dewayne Marrs, Pro Se
• Judge Panel: Before JONES, HIGGINSON, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.
• Case Date: November 14, 2019
• Court: United States Courts of Appeals, U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

Page 288

784 Fed.Appx. 288 (5th Cir. 2019)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

Aaron Dewayne MARRS, Defendant-Appellant

No. 19-10279

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

November 14, 2019

UNPUBLISHED

Editorial Note:

Please Refer Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 32.1. See also U.S.Ct. of App. 5th Cir. Rules 28.7 and 47.5.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, USDC No. 3:17-CR-573-14

Leigha Amy Simonton, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff - Appellee

Aaron Dewayne Marrs, Pro Se

Before JONES, HIGGINSON, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:^[*]

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Aaron Dewayne Marrs has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Marrs has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

---------

Notes:

^[*] Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

---------