Baker v. Microsoft Corp., 12–35946.
| Decision Date | 18 March 2015 |
| Docket Number | No. 12–35946.,12–35946. |
| Citation | 785 F.3d 315 |
| Parties | Seth BAKER; Matthew Danzig; James Jarrett; Nathan Marlow; Mark Risk, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation, Defendant–Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Editor's Note: The opinion of the United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, in Baker v. Microsoft Corp., published in the advance sheet at this citation, 785 F.3d 315, was withdrawn from the bound volume because it was amended and superseded on denial of rehearing en banc July 20, 2015. For superseding opinion, see 2015 WL 4393964.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
Paul v. Colvin, CASE NO. 13cv3128-LAB (JMA)
...light on the case.Discussion The Court is required to address jurisdiction first, before proceeding to the merits. Baker v. Microsoft, 785 F.3d 315, 319 (9th Cir. 2015). Defendants' briefing put Paul on notice that jurisdiction had to be addressed, and that she bore the burden of proving it......
- Baker v. Microsoft Corp.
- United States v. Hurd, 14–2872.
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...v. Gen. Motors Corp., 209 F.3d 1051 (8th Cir. 2000), 104 Baker v. Limber, 647 F.2d 912 (9th Cir. 1981), 157 Baker v. Microsoft Corp., 785 F.3d 315 (9th Cir. 2015), 241 Baltiera v. Gipson, No. 1:10-cv-00590, 2013 WL 264545 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2013), 291 Baltimore City Dep’t of Soc. Serv. v. ......
-
Collateral Estoppel and Prima Facie Effect
...that judgment. Smith v. Bayer Corp., 131 S. Ct. 2368, 2379 (2011); Taylor v. Sturgell, 553 U.S. 880, 898 (2008); Baker v. Microsoft Corp., 785 F.3d 315, 327 (9th Cir. 2015). b. A party that has had a full and fair opportunity to litigate an issue in a prior action is bound in any subsequent......