Humana Hosp. Corp. v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
| Citation | 785 S.W.2d 144 |
| Decision Date | 28 February 1990 |
| Docket Number | No. C-8899,C-8899 |
| Parties | HUMANA HOSPITAL CORP. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. |
| Court | Supreme Court of Texas |
Richard N. Francis, Jr., Jerry A. Gibson, San Antonio, for Humana Hosp. Corp.
John Milano, Jr., San Antonio, for American Medical Systems Inc.
This case comes to us on a question certified by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. See Smith v. American Medical Systems, Inc., 876 F.2d 434 (5th Cir.1989). Pursuant to Texas Constitution article 5, § 3-c and Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 114, we have jurisdiction to answer the question certified, which is:
Under Texas law, is a seller of a product entitled to indemnification from the manufacturer for attorney's fees incurred by seller during the litigation where the manufacturer settles the case with the plaintiff before a judicial determination of the liability of the parties is made?
The facts are undisputed: In 1984 Andrew Smith filed a negligence/strict products liability suit in federal district court to recover damages arising from the rupture of a prosthetic penile device. Named as defendants in the suit were Humana Hospital and American Medical Systems. The device was designed, manufactured, and sold by American Medical Systems to Humana Hospital. Humana Hospital then supplied the device to Smith's physician for the surgical implant. Humana made no changes or alterations in the device, and the hospital was not alerted to any alleged defects in its design or manufacture.
Humana Hospital filed a motion for partial summary judgment seeking indemnity and attorney's fees from American Medical Systems. The trial court granted Humana Hospital's unopposed motion for summary judgment, which would have entitled the hospital to be indemnified by American Medical Systems in the event of a recovery by plaintiff against Humana Hospital. However, the court's order did not refer to the hospital's request for attorney's fees and costs.
Subsequently, American Medical Systems settled with the plaintiff without a judicial determination of the liability of the parties. Humana Hospital objected to the court's order of May 28, 1987, which disposed of the case, because the court did not award Humana Hospital attorney's fees it had incurred in defending the case. In an order filed on February 4, 1988, the district court denied Humana Hospital's claim for indemnification from American Medical...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Amberboy v. Societe de Banque Privee
...the questions certified by the Fifth Circuit in Moreno v. Sterling Drug, Inc., 787 S.W.2d 348 (Tex.1990); Humana Hosp. Corp. v. American Medical Sys., Inc., 785 S.W.2d 144 (Tex.1990); Lucas v. United States, 757 S.W.2d 687 (Tex.1988). Oral argument has recently been heard in Boyert v. Taube......
-
Mid-Continent Cas. Co. v. Petroleum Solutions, Inc.
...& Minor, Inc. v. Ansell Healthcare Prods. Inc., 251 S.W.3d 481, 483 (Tex. 2008)); see also Humana Hosp. Corp. v. Am. Med. Sys., Inc., 785 S.W.2d 144 (Tex. 1990). 79. Gen. Motors Corp. v. Hudiburg, 199 S.W.3d 249, 256 (Tex. 2006) ("The duty to indemnify is triggered by the injured claimant's......
-
Mid-Continent Cas. Co. v. Petroleum Solutions, Inc.
...(quoting Owens & Minor, Inc. v. Ansell Healthcare Prods. Inc., 251 S.W.3d 481, 483 (Tex. 2008)); see also Humana Hosp. Corp. v. Am. Med. Sys., Inc., 785 S.W.2d 144 (Tex. 1990). 78. Gen. Motors Corp. v. Hudiburg, 199 S.W.3d 249, 256 (Tex. 2006) ("The duty to indemnify is triggered by the inj......
-
Gunn v. McCoy
...SSP Partners v. Gladstrong Invs. (USA) Corp. , 275 S.W.3d 444, 457 (Tex. 2008) (emphasis removed) (quoting Humana Hosp. Corp. v. Am. Med. Sys., Inc. , 785 S.W.2d 144, 145 (Tex. 1990) ). Of course, we have held that the comparative-negligence statute20 effectively abolished the common law do......