787 F.3d 868 (8th Cir. 2015), 14-2078, Lynch v. National Prescription Administrators, Inc.

Docket Nº:14-2078
Citation:787 F.3d 868
Opinion Judge:BENTON, Circuit Judge.
Party Name:Patrick J. Lynch, as trustee of the Health and Welfare Fund and the Retiree Health & Welfare Fund of the Patrolmen's Benevolent Association of the City of New York and on behalf of all other similarly situated Plans, Plaintiff - Appellant v. National Prescription Administrators, Inc.; Express Scripts, Inc.; John Does, 1-25, Defendants - Appellees
Attorney:For Patrick J. Lynch, as trustee of the Health and Welfare Fund and the Retiree Health & Welfare Fund of the Patrolmen's Benevolent Association of the City of New York and on behalf of all other similarly situated Plans, Plaintiff - Appellant: David A. McKay, LAW OFFICE OF DAVID A. MCKAY, Alphare...
Judge Panel:Before SMITH, BENTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
Case Date:May 27, 2015
Court:United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
SUMMARY

In 2002, ESI acquired NPA, which provided pharmacy-benefit-management services to health funds created by the police union. In 2003, those funds brought a class action against ESI and NPA. The funds had never contracted with ESI. In 2004, the New York Attorney General sued ESI, resulting in a consent judgment. Based on that consent judgment, ESI moved for summary judgment in the funds’ suit. The... (see full summary)

 
FREE EXCERPT

Page 868

787 F.3d 868 (8th Cir. 2015)

Patrick J. Lynch, as trustee of the Health and Welfare Fund and the Retiree Health & Welfare Fund of the Patrolmen's Benevolent Association of the City of New York and on behalf of all other similarly situated Plans, Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

National Prescription Administrators, Inc.; Express Scripts, Inc.; John Does, 1-25, Defendants - Appellees

No. 14-2078

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

May 27, 2015

Submitted January 13, 2015.

Page 869

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis.

For Patrick J. Lynch, as trustee of the Health and Welfare Fund and the Retiree Health & Welfare Fund of the Patrolmen's Benevolent Association of the City of New York and on behalf of all other similarly situated Plans, Plaintiff - Appellant: David A. McKay, LAW OFFICE OF DAVID A. MCKAY, Alpharetta, GA; William H. Narwold, MOTLEY & RICE, Hartford, CT.

For National Prescription Administrators, Inc., Express Scripts, Inc., Defendants - Appellees: Mark G. Arnold, Melissa Zigler Baris, Thomas McKee Dee, Christopher A. Smith, HUSCH & BLACKWELL, Saint Louis, MO.

Before SMITH, BENTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

Page 870

BENTON, Circuit Judge.

In 2002, Express Scripts, Inc. (ESI) acquired National Prescription Administrators, Inc. (NPA). In 2003, two health Funds of a police union brought a class action against ESI and NPA. In 2004, the New York Attorney General (AG) sued ESI, resulting in a consent judgment. Based on that consent judgment, ESI moved for summary judgment in the Funds' suit. The district court granted ESI's motion, applying res judicata. The Funds appeal. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court reverses and remands.

I.

The Patrolmen's Benevolent Association of the City of New York, Inc. is a union of active and retired New York City police officers. It created the Funds as private trusts to provide prescription drug benefits to its members " in every state of the United States except South Dakota." The trustees are union officers who administer those benefits with money gained by collective bargaining with New York City.

NPA provided pharmacy-benefit-management services to the Funds through July 2002. Alleging various common law and statutory claims, the Funds brought their class action in federal court on behalf of " all current and former self-funded non-ERISA employee benefit Plans for which NPA and/or Express Scripts serve or have served as the Plan's PBM." The Funds never contracted with ESI. The action was transferred to multi-district litigation in the Eastern District of Missouri.

In 2004, the AG sued ESI in New York state court, alleging ESI breached its contract with the " Empire Plan," the State's main employee health plan. According to the complaint's preamble, it was brought by " The People of the State of New York, by their attorney," the AG. In Paragraph 27, the AG specified the bases for its suit:

Plaintiffs commence this action pursuant to: (1) Executive Law § 63(1), under which the Attorney General is empowered to prosecute and defend all actions and proceedings in which the State of New York is interested; (2) Executive Law § 63(12), under which the People of the State of New York, by the Attorney General of the State of New York, are empowered to seek injunctive relief, restitution, damages and costs against any person or business entity that has engaged in repeated fraudulent or illegal acts or otherwise engaged in persistent fraud or illegality in the conduct of a business; and (3) General Business Law (" GBL" ) Article 22-A, under which the People of the State of New York, by the Attorney General of the State of New

Page 871

York, are authorized to seek injunctive relief, restitution and civil penalties against any person or business entity which has engaged in deceptive acts or practices or false advertising in the conduct of business.

For relief, the AG requested: an injunction against illegal activities that " relate to the Empire Plan, other non-ERISA health and prescription drug benefit plans of the State and its political subdivisions, and members of such plans" ; damages payable to the Department of Civil Service (DCS), which administers the Empire Plan, and to " the State of New York" for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and other theories; and, damages and restitution for " injured members of the Empire Plan and other non-ERISA health and prescription drug benefit plans of the State and its political...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP