Webb v. York
Decision Date | 01 March 1897 |
Docket Number | 796. |
Citation | 79 F. 616 |
Parties | WEBB, Sheriff, et al. v. YORK. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
Emma G York, the appellee, being in the custody of Elias H. Webb the sheriff of Arapahoe county, state of Colorado, applied by petition to the Honorable Moses Hallett, United States district judge for the district of Colorado, for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging that she was wrongfully restrained of her liberty by the aforesaid sheriff. The writ of habeas corpus as prayed for was duly issued and served. The sheriff made return to the same that he held the petitioner as a fugitive from justice, under and by virtue of a warrant issued by the governor of the state of Colorado, in obedience to a requisition of the governor of the state of California. Appended to said return was a copy of the executive warrant together with a copy of the requisition made by the governor of California, and the documents accompanying the requisition, on the strength of which the executive warrant had been issued. The papers thus appended to the return, so far as they are material, are as follows:
'State of Colorado, Executive Department.
'The People of the State of Colorado to any Sheriff or Peace Officer of any County in said State, Greeting: Whereas, it has been represented to me by the governor of the state of California that Emma York stands charged with embezzlement, a crime under the laws of the said state of California committed in the county of San Francisco, in said state, and that she has fled from the justice of the said state, and has taken refuge in the state of Colorado, and the said governor of the said state of California has, in pursuance of the constitution and laws of the United States, demanded of me that I shall cause the said Emma York to be arrested; and whereas, the said representation and demand is accompanied by a certified copy of the complaint, warrant, and affidavit duly returned and filed in the office of the police court of said city and county of San Francisco, in the said state of California, whereby the said Emma York stands charged with said crime, which said copy and facts aforementioned are duly certified by the governor of the state of California to be true and authentic: You are therefore hereby commanded and required to arrest and take the body of the said Emma York wherever she may be found within this state, and her convey to the county jail of any county in this state, and her there safely keep, or cause to be kept, to be dealt with according to law. Herein fail not, and due return of this writ make to this department, showing your acts and doings thereunder. In testimony whereof I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the great seal of the state, at the city of Denver, this 20th day of April, A.D. 1896.
'(Seal.)
Albert W. McIntire.
'By the Governor.
'A B. McGaffey, Secretary of State.' 'State of California, Executive Department.
'By the Governor.
Indorsed: '* * * Filed in the police court of the city and county of San Francisco, department No. 3, this 4th day of April, 1896.
'Jacob Shaen, Clerk.'
'Warrant.
* * * *.
'State of California, City and County of San Francisco-- ss.: Charles Crockett, being duly sworn, deposes and says that he was, on the 5th day of April, A.D. 1896, and still is, a police officer of said city and county, and that as such police officer he received the above warrant of arrest for Emma York, charged with the crime of felony,-- embezzlement; and deponent deposes and avers that he thereupon made due and diligent search for the said Emma York, in said city and county, to wit, sought for her at (her) last known place of residence and at her place of business, and in the market place and at the exchange, and that he could not find said Emma York; and deponent deposes and avers, upon his information and belief, that the said Emma York has fled from justice in the state of California, and taken refuge in the state of Colorado.
Charles Crockett.
'Subscribed and sworn to before me this 5th day of April, 1896.
'H. L. Joachimson,
'Judge of the Police Court of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California.
Indorsed: '* * * Filed in the police court of the city and county of San Francisco this 5th day of April, 1896.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Murphy
...or an affidavit made before a magistrate of any state.’ Matter of Strauss, 197 U.S. 324, 329, 25 S.Ct. 535, 536, 49 L.Ed. 774;Webb v. York, 8 Cir., 79 F. 616, 620;In re Strauss, 2 Cir., 126 F. 327, 330;Riley v. Colpoys, 66 App.D.C. 116, 85 F.2d 282, 283. Under G.L. (Ter.Ed.) c. 276, § 14, a......
-
In re Murphy
...copy of an indictment found or an affidavit made before a magistrate of any State." Matter of Strauss, 197 U.S. 324, 329. Webb v. York, 79 F. 616, 620 (C. C. A. 8). In Strauss, 126 F. 327, 330(C. C. A. 2). Riley v. Colpoys, 85 F.2d 282, 283 (C. A. D. C.). Under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 276, Sect......
-
State ex rel. Taylor v. Blair
... ... 428, 99 P. 241. (2) The court erred in granting the writ of ... habeas corpus and discharging petitioner. Webb v ... York, 79 F. 616; Ex parte Ryan, 129 P.2d 1. c. 207; Ex ... parte Nash, 44 F.2d 403; Ex parte Talley, 112 P. 36; Ex parte ... Paulson, 124 ... ...
-
Raftery v. Bligh
...U. S. 324, 331, 25 S. Ct. 535, 536, 49 L. Ed. 774; Pierce v. Creecy, 210 U. S. 387, 404, 28 S. Ct. 714, 719, 52 L. Ed. 1113; Webb et al. v. York (C. C. A.) 79 F. 616. It is perfectly clear that what is meant by the affidavit referred to in section 5278 is an affidavit made for the purpose o......