Yates v. the Vill. of Batavia.

Citation1875 WL 8670,79 Ill. 500
PartiesALPHONSO YATES et al.v.THE VILLAGE OF BATAVIA.
Decision Date30 September 1875
CourtSupreme Court of Illinois

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

APPEAL from the Circuit Court of Kane county; the Hon. HIRAM H. CODY, Judge, presiding. Messrs. PARKS & MCDOLE, and Mr. T. C. MOORE, for the appellant.

Mr. J. O. MCCLELLAN, and Mr. CHARLES WHEATON, for the appellee.

Mr. CHIEF JUSTICE SCOTT delivered the opinion of the Court:

Suits having been commenced against each of complainants for a violation of the provisions of a village ordinance, “to provide against the evils resulting from the sale or giving away of intoxicating liquors,” this bill was filed to enjoin the further prosecution of the suits, and to settle the legality of the ordinance.

A court of chancery has no jurisdiction of the subject of this litigation, nor is it in the power of the parties to waive the questions relating to the jurisdiction of the court, and compel it to try the cause. Whatever defense, if any, existed to the several actions against complainants, was complete in a court of law where they were pending, and the court very properly dismissed them to that forum.

The decree will be affirmed.

Decree affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Kansas City Gunning Advertising Co. v. Kansas City
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • February 9, 1912
    ...Eq. Jur., sec. 857; Chicago v. Collins, 49 L.R.A. 410; Poyer v. DesPlaines, 123 Ill. 111; Railroad v. Ottawa, 148 Ill. 397; Yates v. Batavia, 79 Ill. 500. Francis M. Hayward and E. C. Meservey for respondent. (1) The ordinance in question, except section 4, was a valid exercise of the power......
  • Vill. of Dolton v. Dolton
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • February 18, 1903
    ...relief prayed? In Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. City of Ottawa, 148 Ill. 397, 36 N. E. 85, we held, following Yates v. Village of Batavia, 79 Ill. 500, and Poyer v. Village of Des Plaines, 123 Ill. 111, 13 N. E. 819,5 Am. St. Rep. 494, that a court of equity will not interfer......
  • Hickey v. the Chicago & Western Ind. R.R. Co.
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • March 31, 1880
    ...D. R'y Co. v. Met. R'y Co. 87 Ill. 317. Complainants cannot raise the question of validity of the ordinance in this proceeding: Yates v. Batavia, 79 Ill. 500. The judgment of the railroad company as to the location of its route, when exercised in good faith and not oppressively, cannot be c......
  • City of Chicago v. Collins
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • October 24, 1898
    ...of equity will not interfere. Poyer v. Village of Des Plaines, supra; Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. City of Ottawa, supra; Yates v. Village of Batavia, 79 Ill. 500. No inflexible rule can be laid down for the determination of the question as to whether jurisdiction exists in a court of equity.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT