Patton v. Ludington
Decision Date | 05 September 1899 |
Citation | 79 N.W. 1073,103 Wis. 629 |
Parties | PATTON ET AL. v. LUDINGTON ET AL. |
Court | Wisconsin Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from circuit court, Milwaukee county; Daniel H. Johnson, Judge.
Action by James E. Patton and others, executors and trustees, against Emma Blessing Ludington and others, for the construction of a will. From the judgment both plaintiffs and defendant Emma Blessing Ludington appeal. Reversed.
June 17, 1891, Ex-Gov. Harrison Ludington died, leaving a will executed December 27, 1887, and which was admitted to probate September 2, 1891. This is an action brought by the executors and trustees against all other parties interested, to construe that will. The will contains, among other things, in effect, the following provisions: At the time of the death of the testator, he left, him surviving, his widow, Emeline M., and six children by a former wife, to wit, Frederick, who had a wife and three children, including Harrison Ludington; Sarah E., wife of the plaintiff James E. Patton, who had four children and two grandchildren; Ellen L., who had a husband and four children; Clara, who had a husband and five children; Frances L., who had a husband and four children; and Harrison Ludington, Jr., who was at the time unmarried, but who subsequently married the defendant Emma Blessing Ludington, and died November 15, 1895, without issue, leaving, him surviving, his widow, as his sole heir at law, and also leaving a will, which was duly admitted to probate, and by which he gave, devised, and bequeathed all his property, real and personal, to his widow, Emma Blessing Ludington, and appointed her the executrix thereof.
Upon the trial of the issues made by the complaint and the separate answer of the defendant Emma Blessing Ludington, the court found, in addition to the facts admitted, as matters of fact, that the estate of Harrison Ludington, deceased, was upwards of half a million dollars in value, and consisted of both real and personal property,--about one half being real and the other half personal property. And as conclusions of law the court found, in effect: (1) That in and by the will the testator devised and bequeathed to his trustees, after the payment of the specific legacies in the will provided for, all his estate, real, personal, and mixed, and that such trustees thereupon became vested with the absolute title thereto, and to the whole thereof; (2) that no title, right, or interest in any part of such estate so devised and bequeathed to such trustees was by the will vested in any of the children of the testator him surviving, and that the interest of such children is and was contingent upon their surviving the time or times of distribution provided for in the will; (3) that in case any of his children died before any period or periods of distribution should arrive as therein provided, without leaving issue, his...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Shufeldt v. Shufeldt
...or devise could not take effect in favor of unknown heirs who died before the testator, and it is said by the Wisconsin court, in Patton v. Ludington, supra, 'To obviate such effect, our statute, taken substantially from New York, as indicated in the last case cited, provides that 'when a d......
-
Hull v. Rolfsrud
...637, 640, 154 P. 306, 308; Weston v. Weston, 125 Mass. 268; Crooke v. County of Kings, 97 N.Y. 421, 446; Patton v. Ludington, 103 Wis. 629, 644, 79 N.W. 1073, 74 Am.St.Rep. 910. The plaintiffs rely upon Penfield v. Tower, supra, and Brett v. St. Paul Trust Co., 49 N.D. 653, 193 N.W. 317, as......
-
Williams v. Williams
...N. W. 588;Prickett v. Muck, 74 Wis. 199, 42 N. W. 256;Hiles v. Atlee et al., 90 Wis. 72, 62 N. W. 940;Patton et al. v. Ludington et al., 103 Wis. 629, 79 N. W. 1073, 74 Am. St. Rep. 910;Smith v. Smith, 116 Wis. 570, 93 N. W. 452;In re Moran's Will, 118 Wis. 177, 96 N. W. 367;Stark et al. v.......
-
Wehr's Trust, In re
...Id., at p. 186, 96 N.W. 367.16 Id.17 Will of Reimers, footnote 13, supra, 242 Wis. at p. 240, 7 N.W.2d 857.18 Patton v. Ludington (1899), 103 Wis. 629, 642--643, 79 N.W. 1073.19 Janura v. Fencl (1952), 261 Wis. 179, 185--186, 52 N.W.2d 144.20 (1946), 187 Misc. 489, 62 N.Y.S.2d 373.21 Id., a......