794 Fed.Appx. 339 (4th Cir. 2020), 19-2209, Pourbabai v. Kenney

Docket Nº:19-2209
Citation:794 Fed.Appx. 339
Opinion Judge:PER CURIAM:
Party Name:Ben POURBABAI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Brian F. KENNEY, Defendant-Appellee.
Attorney:Ben Pourbabai, Appellant Pro Se.
Judge Panel:Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, RUSHING, Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Case Date:February 24, 2020
Court:United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Page 339

794 Fed.Appx. 339 (4th Cir. 2020)

Ben POURBABAI, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Brian F. KENNEY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 19-2209

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

February 24, 2020

Submitted: February 20, 2020

UNPUBLISHED

Editorial Note:

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 32.1)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:19-cv-01192-LMB-TCB)

Ben Pourbabai, Appellant Pro Se.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, RUSHING, Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ben Pourbabai appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pourbabai v. Kenney, No. 1:19-cv-1192-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. Sept. 26, 2019; Oct. 18, 2019). In light of this disposition, we deny Pourbabai’s motions for injunctive relief pending appeal, to clarify, and to file an addendum or attachment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP