8 Mo.App. 408 (Mo.App. 1880), Mercantile Mut. Ins. Co. v. Hope Ins. Co.
|Citation:||8 Mo.App. 408|
|Opinion Judge:||HAYDEN, J.|
|Party Name:||MERCANTILE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. HOPE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.|
|Attorney:||MARTIN & LACKLAND and LEE & CHANDLER, for the appellant: H. T. KENT and J. A. SEDDON, JR., for the respondent:|
|Judge Panel:||Judge BAKEWELL concurs; Judge LEWIS is absent.|
|Case Date:||March 02, 1880|
|Court:||Court of Appeals of Missouri|
1. The agent of both A. and B., having placed a risk in A., cannot reinsure in B. Such a policy is void unless subsequently ratified by B.
2. Evidence of former similar transactions is inadmissible to show the agent's authority.
APPEAL from the St. Louis Circuit Court.
This is an action upon an alleged policy of reinsurance, by which it is claimed that the defendant insured the plaintiff in the sum of $5,000, on certain cargo-risks which the plaintiff had upon goods on board the steamboat Belle of St. Louis, when at St. Louis and bound for New Orleans. This reinsurance, of date December 8, 1876, was made at St. Louis by Woods & Kennett, insurance agents, and in making it Woods acted for both parties, the plaintiff and the defendant. This firm had for some years been agents of the defendant at St. Louis, and were also agents for the plaintiff and for other companies.
It appears that on December 7, 1876, the plaintiff had over $16,000 insurance on...
To continue readingFREE SIGN UP