Design v. Schneiderman, s. 13–4533
| Decision Date | 29 September 2015 |
| Docket Number | 13–4537.,Nos. 13–4533,s. 13–4533 |
| Citation | 803 F.3d 94 |
| Parties | EXPRESSIONS HAIR DESIGN, Linda Fiacco, The Brooklyn Farmacy & Soda Fountain, Inc., Peter Freeman, Bunda Starr Corp., Donna Pabst, Five Points Academy, Steve Milles, Patio. Com LLC, David Ross, Plaintiffs–Appellees, v. Eric T. SCHNEIDERMAN, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of New York, Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., in his official capacity as District Attorney of New York County, Charles J. Hynes, in his official capacity as District Attorney of Kings County, Defendants–Appellants. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit |
Editor's Note: The opinion of the United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, in Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman, published in the advance sheet at this citation, 803 F.3d 94, was withdrawn from the bound volume because it has been amended and superseded. For superseding opinion, see 2015 WL 8537667.
To continue reading
Request your trial
7 cases
-
United States v. Doe
...prong), or “(2) lacks ‘explicit standards for those who apply [it]’ ” (the arbitrary enforcement prong). Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman, 803 F.3d 94, 118 (2d Cir.2015) (alteration in original); United States v. Rosen, 716 F.3d 691, 699 (2d Cir.2013). “The ‘touchstone’ of the notice......
-
Rowell v. Pettijohn
...law, reversing the district court. Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman, 808 F.3d 118 (2d Cir.), amending and superseding 803 F.3d 94 (2d Cir.2015). Conversely, the eleventh circuit held Florida's anti-surcharge law violated merchants' First Amendment free-speech rights. Dana's R.R. Supp......
-
Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman, 100
...statute.The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated the District Court's judgment (see Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman, 803 F.3d 94 [2d Cir. 2015] ), interpreting the statute to prohibit the plaintiffs' desired single-sticker pricing scheme but reasoning that t......
-
Dana's R.R. Supply v. Attorney Gen.
...New York statute banning all credit card surcharges in the face of a free-speech challenge.5 See Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman, 803 F.3d 94, 106 (2d Cir.2015). The court began with the basic premise that "prices, although necessarily communicated through language, do not rank as ‘......
Request a trial to view additional results