Johnstone v. Kelly, 160
| Decision Date | 02 March 1987 |
| Docket Number | No. 160,D,160 |
| Citation | 812 F.2d 821 |
| Parties | Gregory JOHNSTONE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Walter J. KELLY, Superintendent, Attica Correctional Facility, Respondent-Appellee. ocket 86-2199. . Motion for Clarification of Mandate |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit |
Before VAN GRAAFEILAND, MESKILL and NEWMAN, Circuit Judges.
On December 24, 1986, we ruled that the petitioner-appellant, Gregory Johnstone, was entitled to his release from custody unless the State of New York promptly afforded him a new trial. Johnstone v. Kelly, 808 F.2d 214 (2d Cir.1986). That ruling resulted from a holding that Johnstone's state court conviction had been obtained in violation of his constitutional right to represent himself. The State now seeks a clarification of the mandate endorsing its view that the State can satisfy its obligation to Johnstone by affording him a retrial at which he would be required to represent himself. The State, now represented by the District Attorney for New York County, 1 contends that since the only constitutional defect in Johnstone's conviction was denial of the right to proceed pro se, the State need only provide a retrial at which Johnstone represents himself. If Johnstone is permitted to be represented by counsel at the retrial, the argument continues, he will "receive again what the state once provided him." Memorandum of Appellee on Motion to Clarify Mandate at 3.
The State's position is not well taken. The Sixth Amendment guarantees Johnstone the right to represent himself, if he so chooses, at any trial the State may initiate. But the Amendment also assures him the right to have the assistance of counsel. At Johnstone's first trial, he assessed the circumstances then confronting him and elected to represent himself. The unjustified denial of that request led to a conviction that was successfully challenged by a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. If the State elects to retry Johnstone rather than release him, the State will be obligated at any retrial to afford Johnstone all of his constitutional rights, including the right to have the assistance of counsel and the right to represent himself. In deciding which component of his Sixth Amendment right he wishes to exercise at a retrial, Johnstone is entitled to assess the circumstances then confronting him and decide whether representation by counsel or proceeding pro se will best serve his interests at the retrial.
If...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
U.S.A. v. Johnson
...in the only cases to have considered the issue. United States v. McKinley, 58 F.3d 1475, 1483 (10th Cir. 1995); Johnstone v. Kelly, 812 F.2d 821 (2d Cir. 1987) (per curiam). The point is rather that if he wants on remand exactly what he had in his first trial, namely representation by compe......
-
U.S. v. McKinley, 93-8132
...Faretta imposes no such qualifications on the right to defend pro se.") (citation omitted), recall of mandate denied, 812 F.2d 821 (2d Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 928, 107 S.Ct. 3212, 96 L.Ed.2d 699 (1987); Bennett, 539 F.2d at 51 ("[A] court determination that an accused lac......
-
Hacker v. Herbert
...his Constitutional rights, including the right to have the assistance of counsel and the right to represent himself." Johnstone v. Kelly, 812 F.2d 821, 822 (2nd Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 928, 107 S.Ct. 3212, 96 L.Ed.2d 699 ...
-
U.S. v. Mills
...... In September 1987, Secret Service agents arrested John Kelly in possession of $5,400 in counterfeit $100 bills. Kelly agreed to cooperate with the agents. He ... The right is either respected or denied; its deprivation cannot be harmless."); Johnstone v. Kelly, 808 F.2d 214, 217-19 (2d Cir.), clarification of mandate denied per curiam, 812 F.2d 821 ......