FMC Wyoming Corp. v. Hodel, s. 84-2175

Decision Date09 April 1987
Docket NumberNos. 84-2175,84-2208,s. 84-2175
Citation816 F.2d 496
PartiesFMC WYOMING CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. Donald P. HODEL, as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior; Robert F. Burford, as Director of the Bureau of Land Management, United States Department of the Interior; Jim H. Taylor, as Chief, Branch of Solid Minerals, Wyoming State Office, Bureau of Land Management; Marla B. Bohl, as Former Chief, Land and Mining, Wyoming State Office, Bureau of Land Management; Harold G. Stinchcomb, as Former Chief, Branch of Energy Minerals, Wyoming State BLM Office; J. Stan McKee, as Former Acting Chief, Branch of Solid Minerals, Wyoming State Bureau of Land Management; and the United States Department of the Interior, Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, Colorado-Ute Electric Association, Inc.; Northern States Power Company; Peabody Holding Company, Inc.; System Fuels, Inc.; Western Coal Traffic League; Colowyo Coal Company, Amicus Curiae.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit

Marilyn S. Kite (Patrick R. Day of Holland & Hart, with her, on the briefs), Cheyenne, Wyo., for plaintiff-appellee/cross-appellant.

Jean A. Kingrey, Sp. Litigation Counsel, Dept. of Justice (F. Henry Habicht II, Asst. Atty. Gen., Robert Klarquist, Atty., Dept. of Justice, of counsel, Lyle K. Rising and Stephen Brown, Office of Sol., Dept. of Interior, with her, on brief), Washington, D.C., for defendants-appellants/cross-appellees.

L. Christian Hauck and John R. McNeill, Montrose, Colo., for amicus curiae Colorado-Ute Elec. Ass'n.

Jack F. Sjoholm, Minneapolis, Minn., for amicus curiae Northern States Power Co.

Terry O'Connor, Denver, Colo., for amicus curiae Peabody Holding Co., Inc. and System Fuels, Inc.

Jon N. Halverson and Charles L. Kaiser of Davis, Graham & Stubbs, Denver, Colo., for amicus curiae Colowyo Coal Co.

William L. Slover, C. Michael Loftus, Donald G. Avery and Pauline E. Waschek of Slover & Loftus, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae Western Coal Traffic League.

Before LOGAN, MOORE, and McWILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

McWILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.

This dispute concerns a readjustment by the Secretary of the Interior of the terms and conditions of two coal leases between the United States and FMC Corporation, a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Chicago, Illinois, and qualified to do business in Wyoming. On administrative appeal, the Interior Board of Land Appeals (IBLA) held that the royalty readjustment was timely and that the adjusted royalty rate was lawful. FMC Corp., 74 IBLA 389 (1983). Thereafter, FMC Corporation filed a petition for review in the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming. 1 On cross-motions for summary judgment the district court affirmed, in part, and reversed, in part, the decision of the IBLA, the district court holding that the royalty readjustment was timely but unlawful. FMC Wyoming Corp. v. Watt, 587 F.Supp. 1545 (D.Wyo.1984). Both parties appeal. We affirm, in part, and reverse, in part, the judgment of the district court, holding that the royalty readjustment was both timely and lawful. This case is a companion case to Coastal States Energy Co. v. Hodel, 816 F.2d 502 (10th Cir.1987).

Our starting point is the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (MLLA). 41 Stat. 437 (1920), amended by 30 U.S.C. Sec. 201 et. seq. (1976). That Act provided, inter alia, that the Department of Interior could issue leases on federal lands for an indeterminate term to private parties to mine and remove coal at a royalty rate to be fixed by the Secretary, such rate, however, not to be less than five cents per ton of coal and subject to the right of the Secretary to readjust the terms and conditions of the lease, including the royalty rate, at the end of each 20-year period following the issuance of the lease. 2

On March 1, 1963, the two leases here involved were entered into by the Secretary of the Interior, on behalf of the United States, and FMC. The leases covered land near Kemmerer, Wyoming, now known as the Skull Point Mine. Both leases were made subject to MLLA (1920) and called for a royalty payment of 17 1/2 cents per ton of coal while providing for periodic readjustment of the terms and conditions of the leases at 20-year intervals. 3

On August 4, 1976, the Federal Coal Leasing Amendments Act (FCLAA) was enacted by Congress, which amended much of the Act of 1920. 30 U.S.C. Sec. 201 et seq. (1982). FCLAA (1976) included a provision that royalty on a coal lease shall be in such amount as the Secretary shall determine, but not less than 12 1/2% of the value of the coal. 4 30 U.S.C. Sec. 207 (1982).

The 20-year anniversary date on the two coal leases held by FMC was March 1, 1983. On August 23, 1982, some six months before the March 1, 1983, anniversary date, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) sent formal notice to FMC of its intent to readjust the terms and conditions of these two leases on their anniversary dates. 5 On December 22, 1982, 68 days prior to the March 1, 1983, anniversary date, the terms of BLM's readjustments were sent FMC. Included in these readjustments was a readjusted royalty rate of 12 1/2% of the value of the coal mined. The notice of the adjustments provided that the readjustments would become effective on March 1, 1983, the 20-year anniversary date of the two leases, but, at the same time, allowed FMC 60 days to file any objections. FMC filed objections on February 11, 1983. These objections were dismissed by the BLM on April 6, 1983. FMC appealed the BLM decision to the IBLA, the latter upholding the BLM's decision on July 29, 1983. 74 IBLA 389 (1983). FMC thereafter sought judicial review of the IBLA's decision in the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming.

No. 84-2208

The district court held that the Secretary's readjustment of the royalty rate in FMC's leases was timely. FMC appeals from that part of the district court's final judgment. We are in accord with the district court's resolution of this matter.

Section 7 of MLLA (1920) stated that "readjustments" may be made "at the end of each 20-year period succeeding the date of the lease...." 6 In line with the provisions in section 7 of MLLA (1920), FMC's leases also reserve to the Secretary the right to readjust the terms and conditions of the lease "at the end of 20 years from the date hereof [the date of the lease]...." As stated, FMC's two leases were dated March 1, 1963, and, accordingly, the 20-year anniversary date for both leases was March 1, 1983. It is uncontested that BLM gave FMC notice on August 23, 1982, over six months before the anniversary date of the two leases, that BLM intended to readjust the terms and conditions of the two leases.

FMC's position on the timeliness issue is that under MLLA (1920) and the leases here involved the final decision of the BLM to readjust terms and conditions of an existing coal lease may not occur after the 20-year anniversary date of the lease involved. In this case, the final action of the BLM readjusting the terms and conditions of FMC's leases occurred on April 6, 1983, 37 days after the anniversary date of the two leases, i.e., March 1, 1983. Thus, argues FMC, the readjustments of the existing leases did not occur "at the end" of 20 years after the date of the lease, as required by MLLA (1920) and the leases themselves.

The Secretary's position is that there is compliance with both the statute and the language of the leases if the notice of intent to readjust is given the lessee prior to the 20-year anniversary date. 7 In the instant case, such notice was given more than six months prior to the 20-year anniversary date. Moreover, the Secretary points out that, though under regulation he was not required to advise the lessee before the 20-year anniversary date of the particular readjustments to be made, in the instant case FMC was nonetheless advised of the readjustments, including the increase of the royalty rate to the statutory minimum set forth in FCLAA (1976), on December 22, 1982, 68 days before the March 1, 1983, anniversary date. In connection with the timeliness issue, both FMC and the Secretary rely on Rosebud Coal Sales Co., Inc. v. Andrus, 667 F.2d 949 (10th Cir.1982).

The coal lease in Rosebud was entered into on April 5, 1935, and, under MLLA (1920) and the terms of the lease, was subject to readjustment by the Secretary at the end of each succeeding 20-year period. Accordingly, the end of the second 20-year period occurred on April 5, 1975. In Rosebud, there was no notice of any sort sent the coal company by any representative of the Department of the Interior until October 4, 1977, two and one-half years after the expiration of the second 20-year period. On this latter date a notice was sent the coal company by the Department advising the former that the terms and conditions of the existing lease were going to be readjusted to conform with the requirements of FCLAA (1976). The IBLA held that there could be a readjustment of the terms and conditions of Rosebud's lease at a time over two and one-half years after the anniversary date of the lease. California Portland Cement Co., Rosebud Coal Sales Co., 40 IBLA 339 (1979). Rosebud sought judicial review of that administrative decision. The United States District Court for the District of Wyoming held that the lease could not be readjusted two and one-half years after the anniversary date of the lease and reversed the IBLA's decision.

On appeal, in Rosebud, we affirmed the district court, stating that the issue was a "narrow one", i.e., "whether by a notice given about two and one-half years after the anniversary date the Department has authority to exercise a right given it under the Mineral Leasing Act to readjust the terms of the coal lease." 667 F.2d at 950. Our answer in Rosebud to that narrow issue was that such notice did not give the Department...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Farr v. C.I.R., 93-70446
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • November 1, 1994
  • Coastal States Energy Co. v. Hodel, 86-1301
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • April 9, 1987
    ...629 F.Supp. 9 (D.Utah 1985). On appeal, we affirm with one exception. The instant case is a companion case to FMC Wyoming Corporation v. Hodel, 816 F.2d 496 (10th Cir.1987). Coastal, as the successor in interest, holds two leases issued by the Secretary under the Mineral Lands Leasing Act o......
  • Western Energy Co. v. U.S. Dept. of Interior
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • May 8, 1991
    ...lease. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 1 Western Fuels-Utah v. Lujan, 895 F.2d 780 (D.C.Cir.1990); FMC Wyoming Corp. v. Hodel, 816 F.2d 496 (10th Cir.1987); Coastal States Energy Co. v. Hodel, 816 F.2d 502 (10th Cir.1987); Trapper Mining Inc. v. Lujan, 923 F.2d 774 (10th ...
  • Trapper Min. Inc. v. Lujan, s. 89-1372
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • January 15, 1991
    ...the Secretary not only can but also must impose FCLAA's mandatory terms at post-FCLAA readjustment opportunities. FMC Wyoming Corp. v. Hodel, 816 F.2d 496 (10th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1041, 108 S.Ct. 772, 98 L.Ed.2d 859 (1988); Coastal States Energy Co. v. Hodel, 816 F.2d 502 (10......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • CHAPTER 1 EVOLUTION OF FEDERAL PUBLIC LAND AND RESOURCES LAW
    • United States
    • FNREL - Special Institute Public Land Law II (FNREL)
    • Invalid date
    ...[482] Id. at 555 n.3. [483] Rosebud Coal Sales Co. v. Andrus, 667 F.2d 949 (10th Cir. 1982). [484] But cf. FMC Wyoming Corp. v. Hodel, 816 F.2d 496 (10th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1041 (1988) (notice sent before anniversary date was sufficient even though adjustment proceedings wer......
  • ROYALTY VALUATION PROCEDURES
    • United States
    • FNREL - Special Institute Federal and Indian Oil and Gas Royalty Valuation and Management (FNREL)
    • Invalid date
    ...as to leases that are "readjusted" at their initial 20-year anniversary date following FCLAA's enactment. See, FMC Wyoming Corp. v. Hodel, 816 F.2d 496 (10th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1041 (1988); Colowyo Coal Co. v. Lujan, 895 F.2d 780 (D.C. Cir.), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 48 (1990......
  • CHAPTER 9 FEDERAL COAL VALUATION—GROSS REALIZATION
    • United States
    • FNREL - Special Institute Royalty Valuation and Management (FNREL)
    • Invalid date
    ...paper, but instead will concentrate my analysis on the separate but related issue of determining "value." (See FMC Wyoming Corp. v. Hodel, 816 F.2d 496 (10th Cir. 1987), cert. denied January 25, 1988; and Coastal States Energy Company v. Watt, 816 F.2d 502 (10th Cir. 1987); but also see Pea......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT