Swett v. State

Citation829 So.2d 901
PartiesJ. Patrick SWETT, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Decision Date10 October 2002
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Florida

Terrence E. Kehoe and Donald R. West, Orlando, FL, for Petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, FL, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted review of the decision in State v. Swett, 772 So.2d 48 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000), based on alleged express and direct conflict with Frazier v. State, 766 So.2d 459 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), and Daniels v. State, 568 So.2d 63 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Upon further consideration, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss this case.

It is so ordered.

ANSTEAD, C.J., SHAW, WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., and HARDING, Senior Justice, concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
27 cases
  • Aguilera v. Inservices, Inc.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • June 16, 2005
    ...... See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; see also Knowles v. State, 848 So.2d 1055, 1056 (Fla.2003) (accepting jurisdiction based on conflict created by misapplication of decisional law); Robertson v. State, 829 ......
  • Gainesville Woman Care, LLC v. State
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • February 16, 2017
  • Robertson v. State
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • October 10, 2002
  • State v. Baez
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • November 10, 2004
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT