Pittman v. Dow Jones & Co., Inc.

Decision Date09 December 1987
Docket NumberNo. 87-3548,87-3548
Citation834 F.2d 1171
Parties14 Media L. Rep. 2384 John PITTMAN and Iddo Pittman, Jr., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DOW JONES & COMPANY, INC., d/b/a The Wall Street Journal, Defendant-Appellee. Summary Calendar.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

Iddo Pittman, Jr., Tom H. Matheny, Pittman & Matheny, Hammond, La., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Jack M. Weiss, Mary Louise Strong, Phelps, Dunbar, Marks, Claverie & Sims, New Orleans, La., for defendant-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana; Martin L.C. Feldman, Judge.

Before RUBIN, RANDALL and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The district court's order and reasons in this case, 662 F.Supp. 921 (E.D.La.1987), were sensitive to the court's role as an Erie court. Finding no support in the Louisiana law for the plaintiffs' theories of recovery in tort or in contract, the district court dismissed the plaintiffs' case. The plaintiffs' appellate brief cites no new authority, but simply urges us as a matter of public policy to place the responsibility for the plaintiffs' loss on The Wall Street Journal. Even if we agreed with the plaintiffs' policy arguments, which we do not, we are not free to fashion new theories of recovery under Louisiana law.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed on the basis of that court's opinion.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Doddy v. Oxy USA, Inc., 95-21023
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • December 18, 1996
    ...that our task under Erie is to apply existing state law, not to adopt innovative theories for the state); Pittman v. Dow Jones & Company, Inc., 834 F.2d 1171, 1171 (5th Cir.1987) ("[W]e are not free to fashion new theories of recovery under Louisiana law."). Therefore, we affirm the distric......
  • American Waste & Pollution Control Co. v. Browning-Ferris, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • December 23, 1991
    ...396-98 (5th Cir.1986) (en banc)). "[W]e are not free to fashion new theories of recovery under Louisiana law." Pittman v. Dow Jones & Co., 834 F.2d 1171, 1171 (5th Cir.1987). A. In Spurney, the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized a very narrow cause of action for tortious interference with c......
  • Braun v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • August 13, 1992
    ... ... In Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Mfg. Co., 313 U.S. 487, 494, 61 S.Ct. 1020, 1020, 85 L.Ed. 1477 (1941), the ... 101 (advertisement for tampons that caused toxic shock); cf. Pittman v. Dow Jones & Co., 662 F.Supp. 921 (E.D.La.), aff'd, 834 F.2d 1171 (5th Cir.1987) (fraudulent ... ...
  • Birmingham v. Fodor's Travel Publications, Inc.
    • United States
    • Hawaii Supreme Court
    • July 20, 1992
    ... ... See also Johnston v. KFC Nat'l Management Co., 71 Haw. 229, 232, 788 P.2d 159, 161 (1990) ("A necessary element in a negligence action is a ... 3 See, e.g., Jones v. J.B. Lippincott Co., 694 F.Supp. 1216, 1216-17 (D.Md.1988) (publisher who serves function of ... with respect to the publication's contents and makes no warranty as to its contents); Pittman v. Dow Jones & Co., 662 F.Supp. 921, 922 (E.D.La.), aff'd, 834 F.2d 1171 (5th Cir.1987) ("[A] ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • How the Fifty States View Electronic Data as a “Product”
    • United States
    • LexBlog United States
    • July 31, 2023
    ...tort exists for a newspaper publisher to investigate its advertisers for the correctness of the ads placed in the publication”), aff’d, 834 F.2d 1171 (5th Cir. 1987) (per curiam). Maine Maine has a product liability statute that does not define “product.” Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 14, §221. In da......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT