835 F.2d 880 (6th Cir. 1987), 86-4129, Young v. Humphries

Docket Nº:86-4129.
Citation:835 F.2d 880
Party Name:Robert YOUNG, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Carl HUMPHRIES, Respondent-Appellee,
Case Date:December 08, 1987
Court:United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
 
FREE EXCERPT

Page 880

835 F.2d 880 (6th Cir. 1987)

Robert YOUNG, Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

Carl HUMPHRIES, Respondent-Appellee,

No. 86-4129.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

December 8, 1987

         Editorial Note:

         This opinion appears in the Federal reporter in a table titled "Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions". (See FI CTA6 Rule 28 and FI CTA6 IOP 206 regarding use of unpublished opinions)

        N.D.Ohio

        AFFIRMED.

        Before KEITH, MILBURN and DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

        ORDER

        This Ohio prisoner, represented by counsel, appeals the district court's judgment dismissing his habeas corpus petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Upon examination of the record and the briefs, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).

        The petitioner sought to attack his conviction of felonious assault obtained on his plea of guilty, raising the following three grounds: 1) the trial court erred by refusing to allow him to withdraw his plea prior to sentencing; 2) the trial court failed to inform him of the elements of the crime...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP