Tate v. State
| Decision Date | 15 December 2005 |
| Citation | 835 N.E.2d 499,841 N.E.2d 192 |
| Parties | TATE v. STATE. |
| Court | Indiana Supreme Court |
Transfer denied.
All Justices concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
39 cases
-
Peel v. State
...a search even when he or she has not paid for the room. Ceroni v. State, 559 N.E.2d 372, 373 (Ind.Ct.App. 1990). In Tate v. State, 835 N.E.2d 499, 506 (Ind.Ct.App.2005), trans. denied, this court recognized that the defendant, "as a registered guest of the motel, undoubtedly had proper auth......
-
Keen v. City of India
.... . stalking . . . ." Ind. Code § 35-47-4-5(b)(22). "Possession of a firearm may be either actual or constructive." Tate v. State, 835 N.E.2d 499, 511 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005). "[A] person who has the intent and capability to maintain control over a firearm has constructive possession." Id. "To......
-
Peters v. State , 43A05–1103–CR–144.
...Ohio. The jury reasonably could have inferred Peters had possessed the gun found on the roof of the church. See Tate v. State,835 N.E.2d 499, 510 (Ind.Ct.App.2005) (conviction of Class B felony unlawful possession of a firearm supported by circumstantial evidence), trans. denied. Thus, the ......
-
Truax v. State
...Rule 803(8)(a) because an investigative police report is inadmissible hearsay unless introduced by the defendant. Tate v. State, 835 N.E.2d 499, 508-09 (Ind.Ct.App.2005), trans. Even if we assume that Trooper Sorrell's written notes constitute an investigative report and are inadmissible he......
Request a trial to view additional results