Shank v. The United Brethren Mutual Aid Society

Decision Date04 June 1877
Citation84 Pa. 385
PartiesShank <I>versus</I> The United Brethren Mutual Aid Society.
CourtPennsylvania Supreme Court

Before AGNEW, C. J., SHARSWOOD, MERCUR, GORDON, PAXSON, WOODWARD and STERRETT, JJ.

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Lebanon county: Of May Term 1877, No. 202.

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED

A. R. Boughter, for plaintiff in error.—The mere fact of death in an unknown manner creates no presumption of suicide; upon evenly balanced testimony the law assumes innocence rather than crime, and preponderating evidence is necessary to establish the latter: Continental Ins. Co. v. Delpeuch, 1 Norris 225.

The burthen of proving suicide is upon the party who alleges it: Nimick v. Mutual Life Ins. Co., 10 Am. Law Reg. N. S. 101; Bliss on Life Insurance 624.

In the absence of motive there was a strong presumption that the death was accidental and the evidence submitted should not have gone to the jury.

John Benson, for defendant in error.—It was for the jury to determine under the circumstances of this case whether the deceased had committed suicide: Wenrich & Co. v. Heffner, 2 Wright 207; Express Co. v. Wile, 14 P. F. Smith 201; McKee v. Bidwell, 24 P. F. Smith 218.

The judgment of the Supreme Court was entered June 4th 1877, PER CURIAM.

Suicide is a question of intention to be inferred from the circumstances where no direct evidence exists. The circumstances in this case were sufficient to go to the jury on this question. Indeed there was no other means of determining the intention of the alleged suicide.

Judgment affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Hale v. Life Indemnity & Investment Company
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Minnesota (US)
    • 2 d2 Julho d2 1895
    ......Co. v. Hogan,. 80 Ill. 35; Mutual Benefit Life Ins. Co. v. Daviess,. 87 Ky. 541, 9 S.W. 812; Shank v. United Brethren. Soc., 84 Pa. 385; Continental Ins. Co. ......
  • Hill v. Central Accident Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
    • 4 d5 Novembro d5 1904
    ......McCain and W. J. Christy, for. appellee, cited: Shank v. United Brethren Mut. Aid. Society, 84 Pa. 385; ...Co. v. Thornton, 49. L.R.A. 116; Anthony v. Mutual Accident Assn., 26. L.R.A. 406; Travelers Ins. Co. v. ......
  • Baumberger v. Supreme Hive Ladies of the Maccabees
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
    • 9 d5 Novembro d5 1923
    ...304; Jenkner v. Maccabees, 243 Pa. 281; 19 Cyc., 936. Intention is of the very essence of the act of committing suicide: Shank v. Mutual Aid Society, 84 Pa. 385. And see Hill v. Insurance Co., 209 Pa. 632. There must be at least an intent to take one's own life, whether the mind entertainin......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT