Bormuth v. Cnty. of Jackson, 15-1869
| Citation | 855 F.3d 694 (Mem) |
| Decision Date | 27 February 2017 |
| Docket Number | No. 15-1869,15-1869 |
| Parties | Peter Carl BORMUTH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF JACKSON, Defendant-Appellee. |
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit) |
ORDER
A member of the en banc court sua sponte requested a poll in this case pursuant to 6 Cir. I.O.P. 35(e). A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service has voted for rehearing en banc of this case. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(b) provides as follows:
The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court are vacated, the mandate is stayed, and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
Fields v. Speaker of the Pa. House of Representatives
...Jackson, 849 F.3d 266, 290 (6th Cir. 2017). Both decisions have been vacated for rehearing en banc. See Bormuth v. Cty. of Jackson, 855 F.3d 694, 2017 WL 744030 (6th Cir. Feb. 27, 2017) ; Lund v. Rowan Cty., 670 Fed.Appx. 106, 2016 WL 6441047 (4th Cir. Oct. 31, 2016).167 Binderup v. Att'y G......
-
Bormuth v. Cnty. of Jackson
...Clause challenge. Bormuth v. Cty. of Jackson , 849 F.3d 266 (6th Cir. 2017). Thereafter, we sua sponte granted rehearing en banc. 855 F.3d 694 (6th Cir. 2017) (mem.).B.Before turning to the merits of the appeal, we pause to address why our factual recitation excludes certain statements made......
- United States v. Velasco, 16-30341