855 F.3d 694 (6th Cir. 2017), 15-1869, Bormuth v. County of Jackson

Docket Nº:15-1869
Citation:855 F.3d 694
Party Name:PETER CARL BORMUTH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF JACKSON, Defendant-Appellee
Attorney:PETER CARL BORMUTH, Plaintiff - Appellant, Pro se, Jackson, MI. For COUNTY OF JACKSON, Defendant - Appellee: Richard D. McNulty, Cohl, Stoker & Toskey, Lansing, MI. For AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE, Amicus Curiae: Richard Brian Katskee, Americans United for Separation of Ch...
Judge Panel:Before: COLE, Chief Judge; BOGGS, BATCHELDER, MOORE, CLAY, GIBBONS, ROGERS, SUTTON, COOK McKEAGUE, GRIFFIN, KETHLEDGE, WHITE, STRANCH, and DONALD, Circuit Judges.
Case Date:February 27, 2017
Court:United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
 
FREE EXCERPT

Page 694

855 F.3d 694 (6th Cir. 2017)

PETER CARL BORMUTH, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

COUNTY OF JACKSON, Defendant-Appellee

No. 15-1869

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

February 27, 2017

PETER CARL BORMUTH, Plaintiff - Appellant, Pro se, Jackson, MI.

For COUNTY OF JACKSON, Defendant - Appellee: Richard D. McNulty, Cohl, Stoker & Toskey, Lansing, MI.

For AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE, Amicus Curiae: Richard Brian Katskee, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Washington, DC.

Before: COLE, Chief Judge; BOGGS, BATCHELDER, MOORE, CLAY, GIBBONS, ROGERS, SUTTON, COOK McKEAGUE, GRIFFIN, KETHLEDGE, WHITE, STRANCH, and DONALD, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

A member of the en banc court sua sponte requested a poll in this case pursuant to 6 Cir. I.O.P. 35(e). A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service has voted for rehearing en banc of this case. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(b) provides as follows: The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP