Brower v. Life Ins. Co. of Virginia
Decision Date | 29 April 1898 |
Citation | 86 F. 748 |
Parties | BROWER v. LIFE INS. CO. OF VIRGINIA. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit |
A. E Holton, for plaintiff.
MacRae & Day, for defendant.
The plaintiff instituted his proceedings in the state court of North Carolina. They have been removed into this court. The facts of this case are these:
The Life Insurance Company of Virginia is a corporation of the state of Virginia. Besides being engaged in the business of life insurance, it is authorized by its charter to lend its surplus profits on mortgages or loans of real estate. For many years it has been engaged in making such loans. Under its fixed rules, no loans are made except to persons who hold policies in the company, either life policies or endowment policies. The plaintiff, John M. Brower, a citizen of the state of North Carolina, resident at Mt. Airy, in that state desiring to improve certain real estate in that town, wished to borrow the sum of $5,000. He made application to Mr Carter, an attorney at law, at Mt. Airy, who examined titles for the company, to effect a loan for him. Carter explained to him the rule of the company, limiting its loans to policy holders; and Brower qualified himself by subscribing to three endowment policies in the Life Insurance Company of Virginia, one for $1,000, and two for $2,000 each. He then made application for a loan of $5,000 for the term of seven years, interest 6 per cent. per annum, payable monthly, on the last Saturday of each month, at such place as lender may direct, the loan to be secured by mortgage of real estate. The original application for $5,000 was withdrawn, and three separate applications of the same kind were made,-- one for $1,000, and two for $2,000 each. The real estate of Brower which he wished to improve was in three separate parcels, and this division of the sum needed was made for convenience. The application was granted. The insurance company furnished Brower $1,000, and took his bond in the penal sum of $2,000, of which this is a copy:
John M. Brower. (Seal.)'
To secure this bond, he and his wife executed a deed of trust to J. W. Ashby and W. F. Carter, as trustees, covering a lot of land at Mt. Airy, with power of sale in case of default in any of the covenants in the deed. Afterwards another loan of $2,000 was made, secured by the same sort of bond, and by a similar deed of trust to the same trustees, covering another lot in the town of Mt. Airy. The last $2,000 was never loaned, because Brower had begun to make default on the preceding loans. The third endowment policy was surrendered, the company paying him $116. On this had been paid $140. Default having been made on the two deeds of trust, the Life Insurance Company of Virginia threatened action under them, and Brower filed his complaint, charging the whole transaction as usurious, and praying an injunction. The cause comes into this court, and, an answer having been filed and testimony taken, is now heard on the merits.
The following is a copy of the endowment policy:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
National Building & Loan Ass'n v. Wilson
...30 S.E. 241; Farmers', etc., Co. v. Bazore, 54 S.W. 339; Association v. Logan, 60 F. 827; Andrews v. Association, 94 F. 576; Brower v. Associations, 86 F. 748; Guarantee Co. v. Alexander, 96 F. Association v. Rector, 98 F. 171. This rule is the rule in Mississippi also, and has been often a......
-
Manship v. New South Building & Loan Ass'n
...... Mississippi, Virginia, Tennessee, and elsewhere; that since. the appointment of the receiver he ... Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Chicago, M. & St. P.R. Co., 17 C.C.A. 62, 70 F. 201, 30 L.R.A. ...336, 94 F. 575 (referred to. hereafter in this opinion); Brower v. Insurance Co. (C.C.) 86 F. 748; and Association v. Logan, 14. ......
-
The Midland Savings and Loan Company v. Solomon
...control the construction of the loan contract." (Webb, Usury, § 275.) (See, also, Tenny v. Porter, 61 Ark. 329, 33 S.W. 211; Brower v. Life Ins. Co., 86 F. 748, 751; Pacific States Savings, Loan Bldg. Co. v. Green, 123 F. 43, 59 C. C. A. 167; Story, Confl. Laws, 8th ed., 287a.) The rule ann......
-
North American Trust Company v. Chappell
...575; 63 Ark. 249; 67 Ark. 252; 57 Ill. 138; 36 Wis. 390; 69 N.Y. 339; 54 Ark. 50, 574; 57 Ark. 256. This is a Missouri contract. 83 F. 403; 86 F. 748; 88 F. 7; 96 Tenn. 599; 94 914; 101 F. 12. Leming & Hon, for appellees. The transcript is incomplete, and this court will presume in favor of......