Clay v. People of State

Decision Date30 September 1877
Citation86 Ill. 147,1877 WL 9681
PartiesCASSIUS M. CLAYv.THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS.
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

WRIT OF ERROR to the Circuit Court of Livingston County; the Hon. N. J. PILLSBURY, Judge, presiding.

This was an indictment against Cassius M. Clay for a libel. The indictment, omitting formal parts, was as follows:

“That Cassius M. Clay * * * unlawfully and maliciously contriving and intending to villify and defame one Amanda Masters and Etta Masters, and to bring them into public scandal and disgrace, and to injure and aggrieve them, the said Amanda Masters and Etta Masters, unlawfully, maliciously, and willfully did compose and publish, and cause and procure to be composed and published, a certain false, scandalous, and malicious and defamatory libel of and concerning them, the said Amanda Masters and Etta Masters, and caused and procured the said false and scandalous, malicious, and defamatory libel to be printed in a certain newspaper, called the Streator Pioneer, in the town of Streator, in La Salle county, State aforesaid, with intent to circulate and publish, and afterwards did circulate and publish, the said false, malicious, and defamatory libel of and concerning the said Amanda Masters and Etta Masters, so printed as aforesaid in said county of Livingston, which false, scandalous, malicious, and defamatory libel of and concerning the said Amanda Masters and Etta Masters, so printed, circulated, and published in said county of Livingston, is as follows: ‘Brutality. Two young women maltreat their mother. A matter which for brutality is nearly equal to anything which has taken place in this vicinity for some time occurred about seven miles southeast of this village (meaning the village of Streator) recently. The actors in this drama of real life are named Masters (meaning the said Amanda Masters and Etta Masters) and we presume are known to some of our citizens. The father (meaning the father of the said Amanda Masters and Etta Masters) was called away from home on business, leaving with his wife (meaning the mother of the said Amanda Masters and Etta Masters) one hundred dollars to procure the necessaries of life during his absence. They (meaning the father and the mother of the said Amanda Masters and Etta Masters) have two daughters, Amanda and Etta Masters (meaning the said Amanda Masters and Etta Masters), aged eighteen and twenty, who now saw an opportunity to brace up and put on a little style, and in order to further their (meaning the said Amanda Masters and Etta Masters) scheme demanded the money of their mother (meaning the mother of said Amanda Masters and Etta Masters). The old lady (meaning the mother of said Amanda Masters and Etta Masters) refused to give it (meaning the money) up, and the two daughters (meaning the said Amanda and Etta Masters) attacked (meaning the said Amanda Masters and Etta Masters assaulted their mother with intent to rob her) their aged mother (meaning the mother of the said Amanda Masters and Etta Masters), beating her (meaning the said Amanda Masters and Etta Masters assaulted their mother with intent to rob her), and at last knocked her down behind the stove (meaning thereby the said Amanda Masters and Etta Masters knocked down their mother with intent to rob her), where she lay insensible for some time.

‘At last Mrs. Masters came to herself, when the recollection of the brutal treatment she had received at the hands of those who, above all others, should have loved and cherished her and done their utmost to render her last days pleasant and joyous, smoothing out the wrinkles of care and sorrow, nearly drove her wild (meaning thereby that the brutal treatment of the said Amanda Masters and Etta Masters nearly drove their mother crazy), and she (meaning the mother of the said Amanda Masters and Etta Masters) proceeded to the barn to hang herself. The daughters (meaning the said Amanda Masters and Etta Masters) were entirely indifferent (meaning to charge the said Amanda Masters and Etta Masters with being indifferent and not caring if their said mother committed the act of suicide). But an adopted boy, who is living with the family, ran and informed the son of Mrs. Masters, who arrived just in time to prevent his mother from carrying her intentions into execution (meaning that a brother of the said Amanda Masters and Etta Masters prevented their mother from committing suicide). After the brother had departed, the daughters (meaning the said Amanda Masters and Etta Masters) made another attempt to...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • People v. Dettmering
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • June 7, 1917
    ... ... 206]A. C. Bollinger, of Waterloo, and J. Fred Gilster, of Chester, for plaintiff in error.Edward J. Brundage, Atty. Gen., A. D. Riess, State's Atty., of Red Bud, and A. R. Roy, Asst. Atty. Gen. (A. G. Gordon and A. E. Crisler, both of Chicago, of counsel), for the People.CARTER, ... People, 47 Ill. 152, 95 Am. Dec. 474,Clay v. People, 86 Ill. 147, and Greene v. People, 182 Ill. 278, 55 N. E. 341. These authorities do not so hold. In Greene v. People, supra, the court ... ...
  • People v. FullerELGIN, A. & S. TRACTION CO.
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • February 19, 1909
    ... ... 338] William Barge, Brooks & Brooks, and E. E. Wingert, for plaintiff in error. 238 Ill. 121]W. H. Stead, Atty. Gen., C. H. Wooster, State's Atty. (A. C. Bardwell and E. H. Brewster, of counsel), for the People. [238 Ill. 118 [87 N.E. 337] Plaintiff in error was indicted for criminal ... We think the averments of the indictment are sufficient under the statute. Clay v. People, 86 Ill. 147;Crowe v. People, 92 Ill. 231;[238 Ill. 125]People v. Seeley, 139 Cal. 118, 72 Pac. 834. The article itself plainly tended to ... ...
  • In re Simmons
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • October 7, 1929
    ...to publish it, and without any effort to restrain their so doing.’ In the two cases involving criminal libel, which we have found, Clay v. People, 86 Ill. 147, and State v. Osborn, 54 Kan. 473, 38 P. 572, the same rule of responsibility for publication was approved. In the latter case the c......
  • State v. Osborn
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • December 8, 1894
    ...resulting from its voluntary repetition. See 126 Mass. 329; 31 N.E. 656; 154 Mass. 238; 18 N.H. 115; 16 N.E. 553. In the case of The State v. Clay, 86 Ill. 147, the court has gone the fullest extent of the law. In that case Clay made some statements to a reporter derogatory to the character......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT