Kennedy v. Bremerton Sch. Dist.

Citation869 F.3d 813
Decision Date23 August 2017
Docket NumberNo. 16-35801,16-35801
Parties Joseph A. KENNEDY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BREMERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

Rebekah Ricketts (argued) and Benjamin D. Wilson, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Dallas, Texas; Daniel S.J. Nowicki, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Palo Alto, California; Jeffrey Paul Helsdon, Oldfield & Helsdon PLLC, Fircrest, Washington; Hiram Sasser and Michael Berry, First Liberty Institute, Plano, Texas; Anthony J. Ferate, Ferate PLLC, Edmond, Oklahoma; for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Michael B. Tierney (argued) and Paul Correa, Tierney & Blakney P.C., Seattle, Washington, for Defendant-Appellee.

Andrew L. Nellis (argued) and Richard B. Katskee, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Washington, D.C.; David L. Barkey, Anti-Defamation League, Boca Raton, Florida; Jeffrey I. Pasek, Cozen O'Connor, New York, New York; for Amici Curiae Americans United for the Separation of Church and State; The Anti-Defamation League; Central Conference of American Rabbis; Disciples Justice Action Network of the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ); Equal Partners in Faith; Hadassah, the Women's Zionist Organization of America, Inc.; Hindu American Foundation; The Interfaith Alliance; Jewish Social Policy Action Network; People for the American Way Foundation; Union for Reform Judaism; and Women of Reform Judaism.

Gerald J. Russello and Daniel A. McLaughlin, Sidley Austin LLP, New York, New York; Collin P. Wedel, Sidley Austin LLP, Los Angeles, California; Christopher R. Mills, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, D.C.; for Amicus Curiae Former Professional Football Players Steve Largent and Chad Hennings.

Justin D. Park, Bellevue, Washington, for Amicus Curiae Garfield High School Coaches Kellen Alley and Joseph Thomas.

Before: DOROTHY W. NELSON, MILAN D. SMITH, JR., and MORGAN CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Concurrence by Judge Milan D. Smith, Jr.

OPINION

M. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

Bremerton High School (BHS) football coach Joseph A. Kennedy appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for a preliminary injunction that would require Bremerton School District (BSD or the District) to allow Kennedy to kneel and pray on the fifty-yard line in view of students and parents immediately after BHS football games. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
A. Bremerton School District

BSD is located in Kitsap County, Washington, across the Puget Sound from Seattle. The District is home to approximately 5,057 students, 332 teachers, and 400 non-teaching personnel. BSD is religiously diverse. Students and families practice, among other beliefs, Judaism, Islam, the Bahá'í faith, Buddhism, Hinduism, and Zoroastrianism.

BSD employed Kennedy as a football coach at Bremerton High School from 2008 to 2015. Kennedy served as an assistant coach for the varsity football team and also as the head coach for the junior varsity football team. Kennedy's contract expired at the end of each football season. It provided that BSD "entrusted" Kennedy "to be a coach, mentor and role model for the student athletes." Kennedy further agreed to "exhibit sportsmanlike conduct at all times," and acknowledged that, as a football coach, he was "constantly being observed by others."

Kennedy's formal job description required him to assist the head coach with "supervisory responsibilities," "[a]dhere to Bremerton School District policies and administrative regulations," "communicate effectively" with parents, "maintain positive media relations," and "[o]bey all the Rules of Conduct before players and the public as expected of a Head Coach," including the requirement to "use proper conduct before the public and players at all times." Consistent with his responsibility to serve as a role model, Kennedy's contract required that, "[a]bove all" else, Kennedy would endeavor not only "to create good athletes," but also "good human beings."

B. Kennedy's Religious Beliefs and Past Practices

Kennedy is a practicing Christian. Between 2008 and 2015, he led students and coaching staff in a locker-room prayer prior to most games. He also participated in prayers that took place in the locker room after the games had ended. Kennedy insists these activities predated his involvement with the program, and were engaged in as a matter of school tradition. His religious beliefs do not require him to lead any prayer before or after BHS football games.

Kennedy's religious beliefs do require him to give thanks through prayer at the end of each game for the players' accomplishments and the opportunity to be a part of their lives through football. Specifically, "[a]fter the game is over, and after the players and coaches from both teams have met to shake hands at midfield," Kennedy feels called to "take a knee at the 50-yard line and offer a brief, quiet prayer of thanksgiving for player safety, sportsmanship, and spirited competition." Kennedy's prayer usually lasts about thirty seconds. He wears a shirt or jacket bearing a BHS logo when he prays at midfield. Because his "prayer lifts up the players and recognizes their hard work and sportsmanship during the game," Kennedy's religious beliefs require him to pray on the actual field where the game was played.

Kennedy began performing these prayers when he first started working at BHS. At the outset, he prayed alone. Several games into his first season, however, a group of BHS players asked Kennedy whether they could join him. "This is a free country," Kennedy replied, "You can do what you want." Hearing that response, the students elected to join him. Over time, the group grew to include the majority of the team. Sometimes the BHS players even invited the opposing team to join.

Eventually, Kennedy's religious practice evolved to something more than his original prayer. He began giving short motivational speeches at midfield after the games. Students, coaches, and other attendees from both teams were invited to participate. During the speeches, the participants kneeled around Kennedy, who raised a helmet from each team and delivered a message containing religious content. Kennedy subsequently acknowledged that these motivational speeches likely constituted prayers.

C. The September 17, 2015, Letter from BSD to Kennedy

The District first learned that Kennedy was leading locker-room prayers and praying on the field in September 2015, when an employee of another school district mentioned the post-game prayers to a BSD administrator.1 The discovery prompted an inquiry into whether Kennedy was complying with the school board's policy on "Religious-Related Activities and Practices." Pursuant to that policy, "[a]s a matter of individual liberty, a student may of his/her own volition engage in private, non-disruptive prayer at any time not in conflict with learning activities." In addition, "[s]chool staff shall neither encourage nor discourage a student from engaging in non-disruptive oral or silent prayer or any other form of devotional activity."

Kennedy was candid and cooperative throughout the District's inquiry. The investigation revealed that coaching staff had received little training regarding the District's policy. Accordingly, BSD Superintendent Aaron Leavell sent Kennedy a letter on September 17, 2015, to clarify the District's prospective expectations.

Leavell explained that Kennedy's two practices were "problematic" under the Establishment Clause, but he acknowledged that they were well-intentioned and that Kennedy had "not actively encouraged, or required, [student] participation." Leavell advised Kennedy that he could continue to give inspirational talks, but "[t]hey must remain entirely secular in nature, so as to avoid alienation of any team member." He further advised that "[s]tudent religious activity must be entirely and genuinely student-initiated, and may not be suggested, encouraged (or discouraged), or supervised by any District staff." Leavell further counseled Kennedy that "[i]f students engage in religious activity, school staff may not take any action likely to be perceived by a reasonable observer, who is aware of the history and context of such activity at BHS, as endorsement of that activity." Lastly, Leavell stressed that Kennedy was

free to engage in religious activity, including prayer, so long as it does not interfere with job responsibilities. Such activity must be physically separate from any student activity, and students may not be allowed to join such activity. In order to avoid the perception of endorsement discussed above, such activity should either be non-demonstrative (i.e. , not outwardly discernible as religious activity) if students are also engaged in religious conduct, or it should occur while students are not engaging in such conduct.
D. Kennedy Responds via an October 14th Letter

By this point, Kennedy's prayers had "generated substantial publicity." Comments on social media led the District to be concerned that BHS would not be able to secure its field after the September 18, 2015, game, assuming—as it suspected—that a crowd would come down from the stands to join Kennedy's on-field prayer. The District was "not able to prevent that from happening" based on the state of its preparations, and it decided that it would not "prevent access to the field at that point." On the day of the game, the school's concerns were not realized, however, because after receiving the District's letter, Kennedy temporarily stopped praying on the field while students were around. Instead, after the September 18th game, Kennedy gave a short motivational speech "that included no mention of religion or faith." Then, once "everyone else had left the stadium," he walked to the fifty-yard line, knelt, and prayed alone.

After complying in this manner for several weeks, Kennedy wrote the District through his lawyer on October 14, 2015. He requested a religious accommodation under the Civil Rights Act of 1964...

To continue reading

Request your trial
24 cases
  • Kennedy v. Bremerton Sch. Dist., CASE NO. 3:16-cv-05694-RBL
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Washington
    • 5 d4 Março d4 2020
    ...Kennedy's prayers were delivered in his capacity as a public employee and were thus unprotected speech. Kennedy v. Bremerton Sch. Dist. , 869 F.3d 813 (9th Cir. 2017) ( Kennedy I ). The Supreme Court denied certiorari, but four of the justices issued a concurring opinion expressing skeptici......
  • Espinoza v. Mont. Dep't of Revenue
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • 30 d2 Junho d2 2020
    ...decision to begin football games with a prayer violated the Establishment Clause); see also Kennedy v. Bremerton School Dist. , 869 F.3d 813, 831 (CA9 2017) (M. Smith, J., concurring) (coach's decision to lead voluntary prayer after football games); Walz v. Egg Harbor Twp. Bd. of Ed. , 342 ......
  • L. A. Lakers, Inc. v. Fed. Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 23 d3 Agosto d3 2017
  • Kennedy v. Bremerton Sch. Dist.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 19 d1 Julho d1 2021
    ...III , 991 F.3d at 1012–14.When Kennedy sought injunctive relief from the Supreme Court after we decided Kennedy v. Bremerton School District (Kennedy I) , 869 F.3d 813 (9th Cir. 2017), Justice Alito noted that "important unresolved factual questions would make it very difficult if not impos......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • CAS Legal Mailbag Question of the Week –3/10/22
    • United States
    • LexBlog United States
    • 10 d4 Março d4 2022
    ...for an injunction against the district’s prohibiting him from participating in prayers with players. Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, 869 F.3d 813 (9th Cir. 2018), cert denied 139 S.Ct. 634 (2019). Though the United States Supreme Court denied the coach’s request for review at the earl......
1 books & journal articles
  • The Education-Democracy Nexus and Educational Subordination
    • United States
    • Georgetown Law Journal No. 111-3, March 2023
    • 1 d3 Março d3 2023
    ...merely permits on a nondiscriminatory basis,” in a nod to Tinker , 410. Id. at 2010. 411. Kennedy v. Bremerton Sch. Dist. ( Kennedy I ), 869 F.3d 813, 816 (9th Cir. 2017). 412. Id. 413. Id. at 817–20. At least one parent complained that his son “‘felt compelled to participate’ in Kennedy’s ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT