87 Mezz Member LLC v. German Am. Capital Corp.

Decision Date19 June 2018
Docket Number6910,Index 654279/16
Citation87 Mezz Member LLC v. German Am. Capital Corp., 162 A.D.3d 524, 81 N.Y.S.3d 1 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Parties 87 MEZZ MEMBER LLC, et al., Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. GERMAN AMERICAN CAPITAL CORPORATION, Defendant–Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Press Koral LLP, New York (Matthew J. Press of counsel), for appellants.

Ropes & Gray LLP, New York (Gregg L. Weiner of counsel), for respondent.

Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Webber, Kahn, Oing, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Anil C. Singh, J.), entered May 24, 2017, which granted defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint based on the documentary evidence and failure to plead a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The court correctly determined that, under the unambiguous language of the Additional Interest Agreement (AIA), an "Event of Default" within the meaning of the AIA occurred when plaintiff 87 Mezz Member LLC (87 Mezz) failed to make a payment under the Mezzanine Loan Agreement (the Loan Agreement) when due thereunder. Because the AIA uses the capitalized term "Event of Default" without defining it, the meaning of the term as used in the AIA is to be found in the Loan Agreement pursuant to section 1.1 of the AIA, which provides that "[a]ll capitalized terms used herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Loan Agreement." It is undisputed that 87 Mezz failed to make a payment when due under the Loan Agreement, and this failure constituted an "Event of Default" as defined in the Loan Agreement. Accordingly, as a matter of law, an "Event of Default" occurred under the AIA. The court also correctly determined that the AIA's liquidated damages provision may be given effect before the units of the subject property became individually saleable under the Condominium Act. 87 Mezz's remaining contentions concerning its liability for liquidated damages under the AIA, and the calculation of such damages, are unavailing.

Dismissal of plaintiffs' claim for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing was also proper. Under the Loan Agreement, German American Capital Corporation (GACC) had a right to foreclose on its collateral. Moreover, neither the Loan Agreement nor the pre-negotiation agreement required GACC to permit plaintiffs to refinance the loans or to engage in negotiations with plaintiffs. As such, plaintiffs cannot use this claim to "nullify other express terms of a contract, or to create independent contractual rights" ( Fesseha v. TD Waterhouse Inv'r...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
8 cases
  • Hov Servs., Inc. v. ASG Techs. Grp., Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • January 19, 2023
    ...Fin. Corp. v. Gaea N. Am., LLC, 179 A.D.3d 621, 621–622, 114 N.Y.S.3d 878 [1st Dept. 2020] ; 87 Mezz Member LLC v. German Am. Capital Corp., 162 A.D.3d 524, 525, 81 N.Y.S.3d 1 [1st Dept. 2018] ). Plaintiff's fraudulent inducement claim and fraud defense to enforcement of the overlapping cus......
  • Mak Tech. Holdings Inc. v. Anyvision Interactive Techs. Ltd.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 29, 2022
    ...reference the Referral Agreement's definition of the "Effective Date" as November 23, 2017 (see 87 Mezz Member LLC v. German Am. Capital Corp., 162 A.D.3d 524, 525, 81 N.Y.S.3d 1 [1st Dept. 2018] ["Because the AIA uses the capitalized term ‘Event of Default’ without defining it, the meaning......
  • Canandaigua Nat'l Bank v. Acquest S. Park, LLC
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 22, 2019
    ...v. 16 Sutton Place Apt. Corp. , 110 A.D.3d 479, 480, 973 N.Y.S.2d 63 [1st Dept. 2013] ; see 87 Mezz Member LLC v. German Am. Capital Corp. , 162 A.D.3d 524, 525, 81 N.Y.S.3d 1 [1st Dept. 2018] ), and the court properly granted that part of the motion to dismiss the fifth cross claim for fai......
  • Cordaro v. Advantagecare Physicians, P.C.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • September 17, 2020
    ...plaintiffs, via the executed consent forms, to obtain the cash compensations from MLMIC. See 87 Mezz Member LLC v. German Am. Capital Corp. , 162 A.D.3d 524, 525, 81 N.Y.S.3d 1 (1st Dep't 2018) (affirming dismissal of plaintiffs' conversion claim where possession was "not ‘unauthorized’ ").......
  • Get Started for Free