Hand v. Houk, 14-3148.
Citation | 871 F.3d 390 |
Decision Date | 08 September 2017 |
Docket Number | No. 14-3148.,14-3148. |
Parties | Gerald HAND, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Marc C. HOUK, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit |
ARGUED: Jeanne M. Cors, TAFT, STETTINIUS & HOLLISTER, LLP, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant. Charles L. Wille, OFFICE OF THE OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Jeanne M. Cors, TAFT, STETTINIUS & HOLLISTER, LLP, Cincinnati, Ohio, Jennifer M. Kinsley, KINSLEY LAW OFFICE, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant. Brenda S. Leikala, OFFICE OF THE OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellee.
Before: BOGGS, CLAY, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.
This case presents a habeas petitioner who has been convicted of two counts of aggravated murder and sentenced to death. Over the span of nearly thirty years, petitioner Gerald Hand married four women. Three of those women would die, two of them victims of violent, unsolved home invasions. The death of Hand's fourth and final wife, however, revealed a different story. At home at the time of her death, Hand allegedly confronted and shot the intruder, who turned out to be his friend and employee Lonnie Welch. Subsequent police investigation uncovered a decades-long plot conducted by Hand and Welch to murder Hand's wives in order to collect their lucrative insurance policies. Having been convicted in state court and having exhausted his state appeals, Hand now brings this habeas corpus petition. The district court denied the petition, and for the following reasons, we affirm.
In March 1976, Hand's first wife Donna was found strangled to death in the basement of their home. She had also been struck on the head. There were no signs of forced entry, but some items in the house had been disturbed. Hand filed for and received $67,386 in life insurance proceeds and $50,000 from the Ohio Court of Claims victims-compensation fund. Hand married his second wife, Lori, just over a year later in June 1977. They had one son together, Robert Jr. Like Donna, Lori was found strangled to death in the basement of their home. Lori had also been shot twice. Just as with Donna's murder, police found no signs of forced entry but some items in the house had been disturbed. Hand also filed for and received over $126,000 in life insurance proceeds. Although Hand was a suspect, neither Donna's nor Lori's murder was solved. Hand married a third time, but that marriage ended in divorce.
Hand married his fourth wife, Jill, in 1992. Hand moved into her house, and they remained married until her death on January 15, 2002. On the night of her death, Hand called police and reported that a home intruder had shot his wife and that he had shot the intruder in self-defense. The home intruder was later identified as Lonnie Welch.
The Supreme Court of Ohio best describes the police investigation that followed:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Chinn v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr. Inst.
...through the deferential lens of 2254(d)." Kelly, 846 F.3d at 832 (quoting Pinholster, 563 U.S. at 190, 131 S.Ct. 1388).Hand v. Houk, 871 F.3d 390, 413 (6th Cir. 2017). Applying that deferential standard, the Magistrate Judge concluded, and this Court hereby ADOPTS the following detailed ana......
-
Johnson v. Fender
...raise a potentially viable claim is not enough, as ‘[a]ppellate counsel need not raise every non-frivolous claim on direct appeal.'” Hand, 871 F.3d at 410 (quoting Sanders v. Curtin, 529 Fed.Appx. 506, 521 (6th Cir. 2013)). “Generally, only when ignored issues are clearly stronger than thos......
-
Pettus v. Warden, Franklin Med. Ctr.
...a denial of a specific constitutional right; or (4) alleged facts well within the mainstream of constitutional law. Hand v. Houk, 871 F.3d 390, 418 (6th Cir. 2017). The Sixth Circuit has recently held Principles of comity require that we not seek to upset a state court conviction on the bas......
-
Mammone v. Jenkins
..."To demonstrate actual prejudice, the publicity and the voir dire testimony must show that a fair trial was impossible." Hand v. Houk, 871 F.3d 390, 410 (6th Cir. 2017) The Supreme Court has emphasized that its cases "cannot be made to stand for the proposition that juror exposure to . . . ......