Louisville & NR Co. v. ALABAMA PUBLIC SERVICE COM'N

Decision Date19 January 1951
Docket NumberCiv. A. No. 712.
Citation94 F. Supp. 893
CourtU.S. District Court — Middle District of Alabama
PartiesLOUISVILLE & N. R. CO. v. ALABAMA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION et al.

W. A. Northcutt, Louisville, Ky., and Steiner, Crum & Baker, Montgomery, Ala., for plaintiff.

A. A. Carmichael, Atty. Gen., of Alabama, and M. Ronald Nachman, Jr., and Wallace Johnson, Asst. Attys. Gen., for defendants.

Before McCORD, Circuit Judge, and KENNAMER and LYNNE, District Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This court having considered and understood the motions filed by the defendants: (a) to stay the call for a three judge court, (b) to stay the proceedings in this court, and (c) to dismiss the cause of action, is of the opinion that said motions should be overruled and denied. Southern R. Co. v. Alabama Public Service Comm., D.C., 88 F.Supp. 441; Southern R. Co. v. Alabama Public Service Comm., D.C., 91 F.Supp. 980; Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Alabama Public Service Comm., D.C., 92 F.Supp. 579; Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Alabama Public Service Comm., D.C., 93 F.Supp. 544.

The plaintiff, the defendants, the law, and the material facts in this action are the same as in Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Alabama Public Service Comm., D.C., 93 F.Supp. 544.

Findings of Fact

Plaintiff, operating trains 64 and 65 between Selma, Alabama, and Flomaton, Alabama, petitioned the defendant Public Service Commission for authority to discontinue the operation of such trains due to the heavy financial loss occasioned by the operation of these trains, losses which indicate that such service is not substantially used or needed by the public.

2. Plaintiff's petition was denied by the defendant Public Service Commission and the plaintiff is here seeking injunctive relief.

3. Plaintiff is now, and has been for several years, operating these trains at a heavy financial loss, the deficit running as high as $6,000 per month over the period July 1, 1948 to September 30, 1949.

4. The public use of these trains has been small, and there is an absence of necessity on the part of the public for their continued operation.

5. The rural territory which these trains serve is also served by buses, or is on or near improved highways.

6. The order of the defendant Commission is affirmative in nature and is having the practical effect of confiscating plaintiff's property in violation of the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution.

Conclusions of Law

The court adopts herein the conclusions of law as stated in Southern R. Co. v. Alabama...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT