Ernst & Young, LLP v. Morris

Decision Date13 January 2017
Docket NumberNo. 16–300.,16–300.
Citation196 L.Ed.2d 595,137 S.Ct. 809 (Mem)
Parties ERNST & YOUNG, LLP, et al., petitioners, v. Stephen MORRIS, et al.
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted.The case is consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
15 cases
  • Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Alt. Entm't, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • May 26, 2017
    ... ... See Morris v. Ernst & Young, LLP , 834 F.3d 975, 98586 (9th Cir. 2016) (holding arbitration provisions ... ...
  • Hubbard v. Dolgencorp, LLC
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Tennessee
    • September 28, 2017
    ... ... Morris v ... Ernst & Young , LLP , 834 F.3d 975, 985-86 (9th Cir. 2016), cert ... granted 137 S. Ct. 809 ... ...
  • Myers v. TRG Customer Solutions, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Tennessee
    • November 15, 2017
    ... ... See Lewis v ... Epic Sys ... Corp ., 823 F.3d 1147, 1160 (7th Cir. 2016); Morris v ... Ernst & Young , LLP , 834 F.3d 975, 985-86 (9th Cir. 2016). The Fifth and Eighth Circuits ... ...
  • Hose v. Wash. Inventory Servs., Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of California
    • July 19, 2017
    ... ... Defendant contends that this entire action should be stayed pending the resolution of Morris v ... Ernst & Young , LLP , 834 F.3d 975 (9th Cir. 2016), cert granted , 137 S. Ct. 809 (Jan. 13, ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Labor and Employment Law
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 69-4, June 2018
    • Invalid date
    ...al., Labor and Employment Law, Eleventh Circuit Survey Law, 68 MERCER L. REV. 1061 (2017).3. 834 F.3d 975 (9th Cir. 2016), cert. granted, 137 S. Ct. 809 (2017) (No. 16-300).4. 808 F.3d 1013 (5th Cir. 2015), cert. granted, 137 S. Ct. 809 (2017) (No. 16-307). 5. 823 F.3d 1147 (7th Cir. 2016),......